Originally posted by: vibha28
I agree and if they were mismatched then maybe add in something to make it look assembled. Then again, when has ITV ever gone with the logical outlook so it is not as if anyone would have minded. Also, to depend on the ML this much is not the best way to go. I am not sure if you are into reading but if you are Sandra Brown and Nora Roberts are best when it comes to weaving in other stories in their books where leads are good but the side characters are just as good if not better.
I am very much into reading lol. I can read anything that I come across if it sparks my interest. ITV and logic never go together 🤪
I know right since that babaji I don't see Kanaji and he brought them together. He started this whole thing and now he is no where to be seen. How can a divine connection not be the focal point I don't know. I get that Riya and Krishna are unwell maybe for another week but there is that Anusiya and Tillu story, Queen can find clues about Dhruv's innocence etc. Ishaan looks so exhausted and lets hope he is not next in the line to get sick.
I agree. Kanhaji ka kuch aata pata hi nhi hai. Jise ne start Kiya unhe hi gayab kar diya hai 😆. ITV can never stick to there devine connections. There are so many things they can explore but nhi Hume toh new character add karna hai. If ishaan also falls sick they to put the show on hold.
I don't get why bring sada drama in love story. If they needed to show conflict could they have not shown how Mahavir and King didn't want Tara to leave 17th century but DT trying to convince them. In between Samrat plotting and them too overcoming that too with help of kanaji etc? That would have made such nice viewing but they had to bring a shouting babaji who didn't even make any sense. If TT was this bad the curse should have fallen when Queen TT and not when kanaji destined DT.
Every show loves sada drama in a show. Not matter what the original story line is. There were so many story plots they could have shown but no we have to show sh*ty tracks. The writer's might think that it was the right thing to do but we viewers absolutely hate it.
What kind of bad triangles do they have? She likes beauty and she is very vain which is a good thing as Dhruv hates all those things. He was no conscious otherwise he wouldn't even let her anywhere near him. Before Tara he didn't even hold hands with Ayesha and she was his friend so here I am not that worried. Good thing is she is a baddie, I would have worried if she was a good one. She wants beautiful things and is a collector so Dhruv will see through it and he is madly in love with Tara. Plus that is the show so I am not as worried but I don't like too much touching. Samrat never touched Tara and she didn't allow him too. Also, with Samrat he was honest he wanted the kingdom and he didn't care much for Tara whereas this girl wants nice things and she is not shy to say that. Is she there for long or a short while, do you know?
Ulka's character is a cameo till Riya and Krishna return back or even longer. Dhruv has a blind stop for Tara. There is no way he is letting PSM anywhere near him. Samrat was always honest with the things he wanted.
Agree, keep the essence and we can whine and moan but we will handle it but take away the essence and no one will watch it. I am on twitter and even there no one wants anymore MU. They all want DT and some happy moments. I mean really, for a love story this is worse than reading Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. This is so sad - it makes one think 10times before even thinking of love. I hope they give Ishaan a break when Riya and krishna are back as he needs it.
Yep! Keep the essence and we will whine and moan but we will watch. Good humme chidiya valo ka hi daar tha 🤣. I have read Shakespeare once in my life when I was in school for 2 years and i hated him with everything I had at that(Book- Merchant of Venice). Yes I do wish they give him a break he needs it!