Akshu mein gairat hai - Page 6

Originally posted by: JustaFan13

Well, it depends on how you see it!!!

Though he got engaged to arohi for ruhi!!!

He realised that he still loves only Akshara. Instead of spoiling his and Arohi's life, he decided to take a chance. I'm glad he did!!! He understood that akshara doesn't love him and he never spoke about it after!!!

Umm when you get engaged/married to someone you don't love, you extend the basic courtesy of informing them, discussing with them, and breaking up with them first because you made a spousal committment to them irrespective of love. Instead of, you know, let's propose to the married ex's husband first, then let's see if the married ex agrees to leave her husband and son, and then we will think about breaking the engagement with the back-uo fiance..

Also, marriage has social consequences. He could have broken the first abhirohi engagement irrespective of Akshara because he knew he didn't love her. But he let it go to the altar and stranded Arohi there— not giving a damn about its implication on Arohi's life. Because, he loved xyz and that justified whatever he did.

Even the second time around, he did the same thing. He didn't think his proposal's implications on Arohi, Ruhi, Abhinav, Abhir, or even Akshara's life. He loved xyz so he was justified in proposing to them while not having broken up with abc yet.

It's always his feelings that take precedence in his and his mother's lives.

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

😆 jaise character hisaab se fiction and real aajtha hai waise hi. Situation ke hisaab se 21st century and ice age aatha hai 😆

What if tomorrow they show akshara had an ema with abhimanyu( we have many shows which are showing ema too). We should not question akshara for that move too. 😂

I didn't know widow remarriage and divorced folks getting remarried constituted an EMA because, y'know, the marriage ceases to exist.

Didn't know Vidyasagar, Rakhmabai, Ramabai, Premchand et al were advocating for EMA?

Our history books were a lie, godforbid!

Originally posted by: Deltablues

I didn't know widow remarriage and divorced folks getting remarried constituted an EMA because, y'know, the marriage ceases to exist.

Didn't know Vidyasagar, Rakhmabai, Ramabai, Premchand et al were advocating for EMA?

Our history books were a lie, godforbid!

Even abhimanyu staying in kasauli house was bashed left and right. Akshu talking to abhimanyu as a friend was bashed because she was married. But isn't it common that many ppl who divorce will be friendly too they need not be in bitter relationship. If ppl can not accept that then ema kiya toh bhuchaal ajayega.

So it's just an example that every family and every culture is not same. Yes may be in foreign countries all those things mentioned are common but many villages and towns in india still don't support such things.

So we can not just question some one for a show. As they will have their own persepctive based on the place and culture they are familiar with.

Originally posted by: JustaFan13

Well, it depends on how you see it!!!

Though he got engaged to arohi for ruhi!!!

He realised that he still loves only Akshara. Instead of spoiling his and Arohi's life, he decided to take a chance. I'm glad he did!!! He understood that akshara doesn't love him and he never spoke about it after!!!

Obviously the sister is to be blamed for getting engaged to the man who proposes to married women. How dare she expect that the adult man who got engaged to her with his full volition, will, and mind wouldn't propose to a married woman? He was in looooooooooooooove after all.

So all in all, it's always the woman's fault and men are

Originally posted by: Deltablues

Umm when you get engaged/married to someone you don't love, you extend the basic courtesy of informing them, discussing with them, and breaking up with them first because you made a spousal committment to them irrespective of love. Instead of, you know, let's propose to the married ex's husband first, then let's see if the married ex agrees to leave her husband and son, and then we will think about breaking the engagement with the back-uo fiance..

Also, marriage has social consequences. He could have broken the first abhirohi engagement irrespective of Akshara because he knew he didn't love her. But he let it go to the altar and stranded Arohi there— not giving a damn about its implication on Arohi's life. Because, he loved xyz and that justified whatever he did.

Even the second time around, he did the same thing. He didn't think his proposal's implications on Arohi, Ruhi, Abhinav, Abhir, or even Akshara's life. He loved xyz so he was justified in proposing to them while not having broken up with abc yet.

It's always his feelings that take precedence in his and his mother's lives.

Originally posted by: PhoenixRising

@bold - it may be unacceptable to you but even though Akshara refused - Abhimanyu still informed everything truthfully to Arohi. And just like its Akshara right to refuse or accept , Arohi also has the freedom of choice. He told her clearly that he will accept whatever she decides - she decided to stay engaged! If she were just a backup- Abhimanyu could have hidden everything from her!

It might be unacceptablr to you but after he got engaged to Arohi of his own freewill, he owed loyalty to Arohi foremost irrespective of love. Decency dictates that he should have broken up with her first instead of going behind her back and proposing to her sister first. That remains true pre and post leap

Originally posted by: Deltablues

It might be unacceptablr to you but after he got engaged to Arohi of his own freewill, he owed loyalty to Arohi foremost irrespective of love. Decency dictates that he should have broken up with her first instead of going behind her back and proposing to her sister first. That remains true pre and post leap

Disagree. When a marriage or engagement is based on conditions the loyalty is to those conditions, he never promised her emotional or physical loyalty, every relationship can't be judged with the same yardstick of loyalty and fidelity, this is why one has to watch scenes before and after a particular point, he is marrying her to be Ruhi's father, not her husband and he clearly told her this, she accepted it. He also told her that he proposed to Ak and she didn't break engagement after it so there's your consent from Ar, she is not expecting any loyalty that's why she is still with him, she is an adult with a stable career and a family to back her, she can get legal help to get shares of Birla hospital, Ar has no need to be with Abhi, respect her consent and choice

Originally posted by: Deltablues

It might be unacceptablr to you but after he got engaged to Arohi of his own freewill, he owed loyalty to Arohi foremost irrespective of love. Decency dictates that he should have broken up with her first instead of going behind her back and proposing to her sister first. That remains true pre and post leap

I am trying to figure out the switch in two groups, Abhira fans are against Abhira and people who hate Abhi are advocating for AK going back to Abhi, it shouldn't really be difficult for creative team to pull off reunion

Originally posted by: SwatiSingh79

Disagree. When a marriage or engagement is based on conditions the loyalty is to those conditions, he never promised her emotional or physical loyalty, every relationship can't be judged with the same yardstick of loyalty and fidelity, this is why one has to watch scenes before and after a particular point, he is marrying her to be Ruhi's father, not her husband and he clearly told her this, she accepted it. He also told her that he proposed to Ak and she didn't break engagement after it so there's your consent from Ar, she is not expecting any loyalty that's why she is still with him, she is an adult with a stable career and a family to back her, she can get legal help to get shares of Birla hospital, Ar has no need to be with Abhi, respect her consent and choice

Writing in extension of it

When Ak was married to An for Abhir, she didn't promise him any emotional or physical loyalty that's why her sensing Abhi through his muffler after 6 years of marriage with An didn't count as any kind of disloyalty, it just means that they are sticking to their marriage with conditions laid before it. What I count as infidelity was Ak sensing Abhi on bike after trying to move on with An and Ak remembering her marriage with Abhi last week when Abhir was missing and she was brought to Abhi's bedroom. There should not be any room for these feelings after promising a normal relationship to An. When people sign prenups their divorce isn't handled like normal marriages because both parties were party to an agreement, when people opt for an open relationship they both know there won't be any kind of physical fidelity that's why every marriage or relationship should be judged on the agreement between those involved in it. It can't be judged on a parameter set by society for a relationship