Kasturī on Colors Marathi - Page 9

He updated it in June after Kasturi was launched if I’m not wrong. As I say don’t interpret much into it 😆

You will know in the future 😃

and I think no one interpreted shiva jalwa friendship as gay except you. It was genuine friendship; they used second wife term because jalwa reports to him everything and never leave his side. The diologue writer was jalwa himself and for ashok it was his debut show and I bet he never thought much as it was meant for comedy.

The distinction between haves and have-nots was blatant in Saturday's episode.

Divakar gloated in anticipation that the police would beat up non-violent protesters due to his status.

The policeman mocked Kasturi's concern for Nilesh by saying that there would be more pāhuṇacāra - abusive hospitality. Yet the policewoman who was removing Kasturi obeyed Samar when he said to leave her alone. What kind of democracy does a country have when the police think they work for the economic upper class to keep the working poor in their place?

Nānārāva told the commissioner that the arrested boys are educated and intelligent - as if that is a reason to treat them better than dropouts, illiterates, and brainwashed people.

On the other hand, Samar had a moment of introspection when his sophisticated plan, with no one getting hurt for his publicity stunt, was confronted with Kasturi's distress and her solemn promise to her dying mother.

Can't understand why they are showing Divakar is so villainous in this version.

The chemistry between Samar and Nilesh continued on Monday's episode.

Samar raised his eyebrow twice when Nilesh was released, and Nilesh's smile beamed in response. Then Samar invited himself to dinner with Nilesh's favourite foods, and grinning Nilesh got starry-eyed.

What reason does Bhaskar have to smile with Urmila?

The company where he works is a political target, facing public demonstrations, a class action lawsuit, and criminal investigation. That puts Divakar in a bad mood with everybody. Bhaskar is losing wealth and he's powerless to stop it.

The deal that Urmila made not only hasn't pacified the unrest, it could be used in court as evidence of witness tampering, a crime. When Divakar realizes that, he'll turn against Urmila, and regard Bhaskar as worthless by association. Meanwhile, Divakar hasn't fulfilled his promise to give Urmila a position at Kuber Textiles. He hasn't even specified which position; he could put her in charge of the labourers' eating area!

Sure, Divakar is angry with Samar for undermining the company, but is there any sign that Divakar will give up his obstinate choice of Samar to run the company?

Kasturi is playing victim. She was the one who agreed to sarubai's terms, now behaving as though she was cheated. Also Selfish kasturi knows private money lending is illegal and still went to sarubai to seek financial help.

The whole family is so dramatic, non-stop crying, over philosophical, and behaving as though they are perfect. If makers want to create sympathy, they fail miserably here, you only feel irritated seeing the family and kasturi the water tap.

Samar's flirting with Sakshi on Thursday's episode was cute. But the highlight was Samar's montage of memories of Nilesh's ardour and vigour, punctuated by Samar falling back onto his bed with a smile.

I didn't like how Samar tried to control Arpita's movements for his political image, disrupted her phone call, yanked her by the arm ... Being older and male doesn't put him in charge of her.

Samar is trying to use Nilesh as a pawn for his political purposes. Other than that, he has no interest in the family nor Kasturi.

Arpita is a spoilt brat. Samar’s parents are so useless that they can’t even bring up a child well. And they have problem with Samar involving in politics 🤔

Originally posted by: HalleNJ

Kasturi is playing victim. She was the one who agreed to sarubai's terms, now behaving as though she was cheated. Also Selfish kasturi knows private money lending is illegal and still went to sarubai to seek financial help.

From what I could find on the internet, India and its different states have laws against money-lending without a license, with the intent to deter lenders from charging exorbitant interest, and with the effect that illegal lenders can't take their borrowers to court.

Does the law prescribe any penalty for the borrower? If not, Kasturi did nothing illegal by taking Saru's money. If Saru doesn't have a license, the law doesn't recognize the loan, and that allows Kasturi to keep it as a gift. Even if Saru has a license, she can only require Kasturi to repay the loan with legally regulated interest. The contract obligating Kasturi to marry Jaggu is unenforceable.

Nilesh warned Jaggu that the contract with Kasturi's signature could send him to prison for five years because sāvakārī is illegal. Maybe it's common knowledge that Saru doesn't have a license. However, it would be a stretch to prove that Jaggu is criminally responsible for his mother lending her money.

"Selfish" is not the right word for someone who risks her safety with an illegal transaction to save someone else's life. Clearly, Kasturi doesn't feel safe with Jaggu, anticipating that when he has married her, he'll force her to have sex that she doesn't want. Anyone who is being threatened with unwanted sex is a victim. Even the Supreme Court of India last year recognized that marital rape is rape, although it's not yet a crime in India.

On Saturday's episode, Urmila referred to Abha as Samar's favourite bhācī - the Marathi word for any niece except a man's brother's daughter or a woman's husband's brother's daughter. Abha is Samar's putaṇī, not his bhācī.

Is dialogue writer Pallavi Karkera not familiar with Marathi kinship terms? What about Pratiksha Jadhav, who plays Urmila? Scene partner Ashok Phal Dessai, director Rasam Pushkar, post-production head Rahul Madhukar Salgar and others could also have corrected the mistake.