Geonka(s) and Sharma(s)- The self-victims [DT Note: pg-10] - Page 6

Originally posted by: ishqdinoorhai9

Manjiri hided the truth because she was physically, mentally abused. Neil was child out of her husband's affair and the woman instead of coming to Harsh, came to her and she raised him.

And no she was not justified in her reasons but Harsh Birla would have treated Neil the same because even when he came to know the truth, he did not melt.

And AK had reasons but Manjiri did not? Poora gen 3 dekh kar aao

That was in response for people constantly saying Akshara doing it is justified because Manjari did it, but then refuse to be ok when people like me call out Akshara to be like Manjari. Both hid the truth, both let their kid's mental health suffer.

Originally posted by: Lostin90s

What would have happened if Manjari revealed the truth is just hypothesis now. But Akshara’s fears have become a reality.

Bhai Akshara ka darr usne khud shuru kiya aur uske parivaar walon ne kiya? Abhimanyu wanted co-parenting but AK's brother Kairav first started the whole jhol and he have to respond legally. Why would a father who never even got the chance to be a father accept restriction order and then her grandfather started sole custody and put whole lot of stakes FOR ABHIMANYU. He fought and it's not his fault that judge found him to be the better competent parent.

Its not his fault that Akshara did paternity fraud!!!! She lost due to her own self

Not when the person in question has discarded the mother bearing the child like a fly in the tea.

Originally posted by: cutepigs

That was in response for people constantly saying Akshara doing it is justified because Manjari did it, but then refuse to be ok when people like me call out Akshara to be like Manjari. Both hid the truth, both let their kid's mental health suffer.

Exactly, they are like Neil suffered due to hidden truth. So what is Abhir doing? Party finding his real father?

Originally posted by: Lostin90s

Hehe. Good point but you missed the degree of enormity and reasons for hiding the truth. That delineates a clear difference between both the cases.

Like another person mentioned, Harsh toh didn't change even when he found out the truth, but here Abhimanyu loved his ex's son even before knowing he was his and continued loving. According to this theory, Akshara and Manjari were both emotionally and mentally abused and both didn't bother about the child's mental health. So how are they different? Manjari also gave Neil a good father figure in form of Abhimanyu. They are both same, or they both did no wrong.

Originally posted by: Lostin90s

It’s fault of Manjari. After she Akshara being happy with her life and having moved on, she got jealous and literally forced the duo to get hitched. Both of them are adults, if the idea of getting married was unpalatable to them, they could have put their foot down. But none did for reasons of their own.

The sharmas life took the turn for the worst for reason which were not in their control but the same cannot be said about Abhimanyu and Arohi.

Abhimanyu and Arohi agreed to marry for Ruhi’s sake. I don’t support this idea just like I don’t support the reason Abhinav Akshara married - its on similar lines. Marriage is to become companions, not to play father mother roles for a kid- the kid will grow up one day - what happens then!?

@bold - Thank you 🙏 for saying this - this is exactly why when Akshara put forth that condition that she wants Abhinav as father but she can’t be a wife to him after delivery - it felt so wrong! Akshara is moving on now- great but it seems the idea of being married was unpalatable to her too when she married him. But whatever and however she has done things is beyond my understanding!

Originally posted by: chaipaani

Guys koi Goenkas aur Sharmas ko kuch nahi bolega.

Don't forget Dharmik bhavanaon ko aahat pahuncha is bad.

Apparently you can only express your opinions and be a nice human being when you support them and not call out their double face.

I promise to think of the Goenkas and Sharmas as perfect examples, even though they're really good at tricking people, thinking only about themselves. They can also make everything about them, which is pretty amazing. And let's not forget how good they are at ignoring others' opinions and insisting they're always right.🥰🤩

Originally posted by: Lostin90s

Not when the person in question has discarded the mother bearing the child like a fly in the tea.

He never discarded her like afly, SHE DID!

She changed the father's name on the certificate. She put restrictions on him to meet his child. She started talking legally. Legal ka jawab legal tarike se diya jaata hai.

He always said she raised Abhir nicely but if you want him to forget that the six years were snatched from him toh wo possible nahi hai. He only wanted TOO added but all Akshara talked abt how he can meet Abhir twice a year, how she will go back to kausali.

She will fight AGAINST HIM but she and everyone expects him to FIGHT FOR HER? Ye kaisi hypocrisy hai?

I don’t care about Goenkas. Here we are talking about why Akshara didn’t reveal the truth about the baby. I am saying she didn’t coz she knew the Birlas would snatch him away from her and her fears have come true. It doesn’t matter how.

We can’t compare Abhir’s mental health condition with Neil’s because the former had the most loving environment a child can get. And it’s clearly visible in his upbringing and confidence and how much he loves his parents.