Originally posted by: OnTheBlock
Am a newbie with post limits so this is gonna be my last reply to you for the time being. But not to fret, I'll cover everything.
I state in my last comment that if its just a personal opinion..no proof is needed đ
You say it was. So the comment stating 'a mass number of audience not liking a character' is just your opinion and not actually absolute fact/truth. As long as we are clear about that..anyone can keep disliking a character. Its really doesn't matter.
There's a reason I brought up Sairat. It was necessary to prove a FACT actually. They are a couple from another star plus show.
Here goes the fact: on that show..the audience, the TRP audience, the audience that actually matters (since you asked which audience does) rejected the new ML for the FL by sinking the trps significantly. They just refused to watch. The lesson here being : that the TRP audience does exercise their power and likes and dislikes to reject a new ML if they dont want him. If they completely hate him.
The point being : if the TRP audience hated Abhinav for Akshara, disliked him..the TRPs would let you know from the first days of the leap. I mean they have only showed progress in Akshnav's relationship and TRP has been stable. Hope it's clear why i absolutely HAD to bring Sairat here as an example.
In another post you mentioned you took a poll on here on IF and most people here said they didn't like Abhinav. IF.. home to Abhimanyu-Akshara fans and shippers for 1.5 years about a new character Abhinav who's come between them and is the number one obstacle in their way. Now surely it's understandable that this sample size is biased and cannot hold any actual merit đ. The validity of the poll being mass audience therefore stands null and void.
In conclusion, the survey was biased,your opinion personal based on it has no actual grounds and audience that matters, the TRP audience have shown no inclination that they hate or dislike Abhinav in any way which they have shown in other cases. That should settles things.
'A mass number of audience not liking Abhinav' then stands FACTUALLY INCORRECT since it doesn't take into account the many parameters. A personal opinion at best based on a poll with biased participants. The wording could be improved too. . A mass number of IF audience does not like Abhinav, certain sections of audience don't like Abhinav. But mass number of audience don't like Abhinav? Factually incorrect.
So your statement/argumenf that 'mass number of audience don't like Abhinav' now stands demolished. Could have been peddled as a personal opinion but open forum so one can't just say anything without basis, can they? đ
Hopefully I have covered everything. Post limits are an issue esp when it's so easy, almost too easy to counter half the stuff written here...with plain old school logic effortlessly. With or without media communication or law degrees from reputed colleges or IFđ