Originally posted by: chaipaani
@bold first proof of when i said it's a fact.
Also, by the mass number of people so we can't Twitter doesn't count, Instagram doesn't count even in IF doesn't count.
Toh count kisko krna hai.
I am saying clearly that I don't like how they introduced Abhinav's character and how they are presenting him. I know 10+ people here in forum who agrees with this.
For sure you must know a few people who disagree with the comment.
However that's the whole point of this statement, PH is introducing a character that's good, has done no manipulation, has done no crime as such, nothing so bad yet a sample of people are not liking him can't be a coincidence. And please it cannot be like all are abhira fan so they don't want to like him or all are immature only people liking Nav are mature and have morals and so and so.
The execution is poor. It's a character that should not get any hate yet he is getting it.
Rest may be how about you read a comment first and then go after it. No where I said it's a fact
Adding - I have no clue who virat who sai. How about you talk about the characters of the show whose forum you are on.
Am a newbie with post limits so this is gonna be my last reply to you for the time being. But not to fret, I'll cover everything.
I state in my last comment that if its just a personal opinion..no proof is needed 😆
You say it was. So the comment stating 'a mass number of audience not liking a character' is just your opinion and not actually absolute fact/truth. As long as we are clear about that..anyone can keep disliking a character. Its really doesn't matter.
There's a reason I brought up Sairat. It was necessary to prove a FACT actually. They are a couple from another star plus show.
Here goes the fact: on that show..the audience, the TRP audience, the audience that actually matters (since you asked which audience does) rejected the new ML for the FL by sinking the trps significantly. They just refused to watch. The lesson here being : that the TRP audience does exercise their power and likes and dislikes to reject a new ML if they dont want him. If they completely hate him.
The point being : if the TRP audience hated Abhinav for Akshara, disliked him..the TRPs would let you know from the first days of the leap. I mean they have only showed progress in Akshnav's relationship and TRP has been stable. Hope it's clear why i absolutely HAD to bring Sairat here as an example.
In another post you mentioned you took a poll on here on IF and most people here said they didn't like Abhinav. IF.. home to Abhimanyu-Akshara fans and shippers for 1.5 years about a new character Abhinav who's come between them and is the number one obstacle in their way. Now surely it's understandable that this sample size is biased and cannot hold any actual merit 😆. The validity of the poll being mass audience therefore stands null and void.
In conclusion, the survey was biased,your opinion personal based on it has no actual grounds and audience that matters, the TRP audience have shown no inclination that they hate or dislike Abhinav in any way which they have shown in other cases. That should settles things.
'A mass number of audience not liking Abhinav' then stands FACTUALLY INCORRECT since it doesn't take into account the many parameters. A personal opinion at best based on a poll with biased participants. The wording could be improved too. . A mass number of IF audience does not like Abhinav, certain sections of audience don't like Abhinav. But mass number of audience don't like Abhinav? Factually incorrect.
So your statement/argumenf that 'mass number of audience don't like Abhinav' now stands demolished. Could have been peddled as a personal opinion but open forum so one can't just say anything without basis, can they? 😆
Hopefully I have covered everything. Post limits are an issue esp when it's so easy, almost too easy to counter half the stuff written here...with plain old school logic effortlessly. With or without media communication or law degrees from reputed colleges or IF😆
Edited by OnTheBlock - 2 years ago