Alia to play Sita opposite Ranbir in Nitesh Tiwari's Ramayana - Page 9

Logical question:

Why do they show clean shaven Rama with long hair and a knot? If back then they could shave why not cut the head hair? Just doesn't make any sense. I bet Lord Rama had fully grown beard.

They keep same expression to show god as epitome of calm and equanimity, all knowing.

It is leela. God avatar knows purpose of what is happening and why. Hence an unruffled expression to give aura of divinity

Originally posted by: atominis

They keep same expression to show god as epitome of calm and equanimity, all knowing.

It is leela. God avatar knows purpose of what is happening and why. Hence an unruffled expression to give aura of divinity

Yeah and I think that much Sid can manage.

Originally posted by: MaxMayfield

After Brahmastra I Never EVER want to see RK and Alia onscreen as a pair again 🥱😳😵🤣 imagine Alia saying ‘Raaaaam’ in that shrill voice 😳 and RK ka toh rehne hi dete hai individually they can work with whomever they want.😳 Thank you 😊

Lmao 🤣

He looks too modern to me to play Lord Rama. Same goes for all new age actors be it RS, RK, VK, VD, Tiger etc.

I think even Khans, Ajay, Akki, HR were not suited for mytho roles.

Oh no this is very very bad. I hope this film does not get made.

https://www.greatandhra.com/movies/news/kangana-calls-ranbir-skinny-white-rat-129854

Originally posted by: astha36

I don't know I think for a character like Ram, not many expressions are required anyway. I mean in that TV serial Ramayan, the actor had pretty much the same expression for 90% of the time.

Arun Govil's level can never be matched. Siddharth is handsome but lacks screen presence. Sita is literally a flowerpot role where actress should have grace & should look beautiful. Jo v 3-4 dialogue ho uska thoda thehrav k saath emotions match krke bolna h bs. That's it. Ram's character still has some scope

Originally posted by: 1t1svat1t1s

https://www.greatandhra.com/movies/news/kangana-calls-ranbir-skinny-white-rat-129854

Kangana herself is a nashedi & vile lady. She should play Manthara or Surpnakha.

Originally posted by: Lostsoul11

Arun Govil's level can never be matched. Siddharth is handsome but lacks screen presence. Sita is literally a flowerpot role where actress should have grace & should look beautiful. Jo v 3-4 dialogue ho uska thoda thehrav k saath emotions match krke bolna h bs. That's it. Ram's character still has some scope

Wow. Are you serious? Sita has no scope? All the tragedy happens with Sita and she has no scope? That's not true. Anyway that's for good actors. Even if you think Sita is a flowerpot role, Kiara will be great in it, she's beautiful and graceful both. Sid doesn't have screen presence but he looks like a good boy. So that should be enough.