Questions for those who don't agree with Sai's character. - Page 5

Virat is unconsolable after Sai decides to marry Dr.Satya?

that statement itself is ending in a question mark!!!! 🤣🤣🤣

Nothing for all of the above. It's just people making up theories for future that this or that will happen.

Originally posted by: kuchnaakahoo

Some things which I mentioned elsewhere. Copy pasting here. It's not related to ur post though.

Why only Sai is the one responsible for making Vinu aware of and accept the truth. Why not anyone from CN, his own father? Why will he believe Sai who is still an outsider for him? Ghar ki khushiyon ki chabhi to chahiye , but is anyone thinking in Sai's favour? Is Kaku doing anything?

And the situation between pre leap and post leap is DiFFERENT. Pre leap he was infant .

Now he is a 8-9 year old kid attached with his mom . Is it easy to uproot him so easily? Even if truth is told to him, fact is that Vinayak has spent his nascent years with Pakhi. She has nourished him, good bad whatever. He might see Sai as his Aai but he cannot detach himself from Pakhi. Unless and untill she does something really negative and vinu is in the state of mind to understand it.

Whatever she is doing right now DOES NOT make Virat and CN pre leap actions valid!! Please. Both things are exclusive.

And one more point which I wanted to stress on. Virat moving on and Sai moving on do not fall under same category .

Virat did not just move on . Actually moving on was not the issue. Point was him marrying the same woman who destroyed everything with an evil intention. And then the hating spree he went on with after he found her alive.

Did Sai do anything of this sort ?

Nah, people just have an issue with the fact sai is not shown as a super-mama who can single-handedly get her son back despite the father of her son supporting his second wife in keeping sai's child away from her and the father doing nothing in calling out his second-wife's negative antics, and above all this same man ensured that sai's child is never taken away from pakhi with his deeds both pre and post leap of blindly supporting pakhi. Because sai is a mother she is expected to tirelessly try and win over her son without any support of her son's father and with her son already hating her.

Instead of people accusing sai, why are those people not accusing virat of intentionally stealing sai's rights as a mother just to please his best-friend/ ex-lover now second wife? Why do these same people not sympathise with sai for having zero support in her attempts to win over her son and the fact the grandparents and father of her child are supporting the illegal surrogate who they know even before her son's birth was plotting to steal him from sai as a pawn to get to sai's husband she had eyes on?

Looks like people need to have their mind refreshed about sai's journey from start of the show who has non-stop had to struggle with facing losses, humiliation and degradation and anytime she seems to get any moment of happiness in her life, darkness and despair quickly catches up with her and how majority of the times she has been alone in her struggles and most of the people around her were only interested in seeing her break rather than support her. A girl who has had to fight all her life for even basic happiness or respect cannot become weak and give up after a point?

I can guarantee any human who had to face half of the humiliations, loss and loneliness sai has would have given up trying to fight long time ago.