Legality of Pakhi's accusation - Page 2

Originally posted by: Snowdrrop

What if this case opens the illegal surrogacy too. They can show that Pakhi’s uterus was week from before because of vinu’s birth. She was a virgin and vinu’s birth damage uterus.With accident it got more damage and she didn’t took her medicine and go to honey moon with Virat. So the reason of uterus remove was her own illegals acts and carelessness. Nowadays they are showing receiving her karma so maybe she is trying to trap Sai but she can get trapped in it. And they can show that this type of surrogacy can be dangerous which they never showed.

LIKH ke le lo aisa kuch nahi hoga. Kyuki ye to Sai ke favour mein ho jayga na, aur ye paap makers kaise kar sakte h.

P’a first surgery was an emergency & Sai helped the surgeons to save her life. She did save her life when other physicians had given up. Sai was asked not to follow up Patralekha as per family. She did come to CN to take care of her when she was in pain & bleeding but was not allowed to. Patralekha didn’t follow instructions, was non compliant patient. Went on a long distance trip in spite of being told not to after a major accident. That led to wound dehiscence with infection. All this can be proved with medical records & testimony. She collapsed in front of police outside when she was asked to rest. Plus scans, operative reports, pathology of uterus should be available for review.

Another question is was Mrs. Patralekha Chavhan capable of conceiving? Yes she gave birth to a child but the implantation was illegal & she was adviced not to go through it as she wasn’t suitable. Then she had delivery at home by a no medical personnel & was not taken to hospital for postpartum care. She had refused to be under Sai’s care & Sai wasn’t licensed physician then. She was married for 10 plus years but she didn’t conceive & the couple adopted a child. We know reason why but that will come out. So it will come out that she is a virgin even after being married twice for considerable time both times. So looking at her age & no of years she stayed virgin even with two spouses how likely it was that she would get pregnant? So her claim that Sai did it out of vendetta or keep her importance in family through her kids is invalid. Virat was married to Sai for much shorter time & she had two kids with him when she was told she can’t conceive. Why would she go through the trouble of jeopardizing her licence for something which is not happening anyway. If they don’t expose state of P’s marriage with Samrat & Virat & knowing her history & no proof that she could conceive then it’s highly likely she couldn’t.

Originally posted by: ShipIsSailing

This post is like cutting open my wounds... Every time I even think about the surrogacy and post tracks, my mind just goes haywire.

Ghum is like...have you heard the story of the kingdom with the poisoned well? If you haven't, it goes like this...There was once a kingdom ruled by a King and Queen. The kingdom had two wells, one in the palace for the king and queen, and a common one for the rest of the people. One night, a witch came and she poisoned the common well. All the people went mad, except for the king and queen. Seeing this, the King got worried. He tried to address the people and get them under control, but nothing worked. Seeing his behaviour, the rest of the people thought that the King and Queen were the one who were mad, since they behaved so differently. They all started attacking them. This made the Queen anxious. Relizing that there is no other way left, she told the King that they too should drink from the common well. That way the people of the kingdom will once again accept them. So, they both went ahead, drank the poisoned water, and went mad.

...and then they lived happily ever after.

.

.

.

Mujhe lagta hai, ab hume bhi uss kuye ka paani pee lena chahiye.

Latest one being Virat asking Sai to start afresh with him and deciding to win her over , obviously a huge fan base wants it (me too partly bur post redemption) .. par we all know it will take forever .. next month aaram se they will show one more promo of him repenting .. again with a twist .. it’s become a masochistic pattern with the makers and us as well ..

Originally posted by: LadyD

P’a first surgery was an emergency & Sai helped the surgeons to save her life. She did save her life when other physicians had given up. Sai was asked not to follow up Patralekha as per family. She did come to CN to take care of her when she was in pain & bleeding but was not allowed to. Patralekha didn’t follow instructions, was non compliant patient. Went on a long distance trip in spite of being told not to after a major accident. That led to wound dehiscence with infection. All this can be proved with medical records & testimony. She collapsed in front of police outside when she was asked to rest. Plus scans, operative reports, pathology of uterus should be available for review.

Another question is was Mrs. Patralekha Chavhan capable of conceiving? Yes she gave birth to a child but the implantation was illegal & she was adviced not to go through it as she wasn’t suitable. Then she had delivery at home by a no medical personnel & was not taken to hospital for postpartum care. She had refused to be under Sai’s care & Sai wasn’t licensed physician then. She was married for 10 plus years but she didn’t conceive & the couple adopted a child. We know reason why but that will come out. So it will come out that she is a virgin even after being married twice for considerable time both times. So looking at her age & no of years she stayed virgin even with two spouses how likely it was that she would get pregnant? So her claim that Sai did it out of vendetta or keep her importance in family through her kids is invalid. Virat was married to Sai for much shorter time & she had two kids with him when she was told she can’t conceive. Why would she go through the trouble of jeopardizing her licence for something which is not happening anyway. If they don’t expose state of P’s marriage with Samrat & Virat & knowing her history & no proof that she could conceive then it’s highly likely she couldn’t.

@bold: Virgin or not, Pakhi's age could have been a major risk issue. Pregnancy over 35 increases the risk of the child having genetic disorders, like Down Syndrome, etc. And Pakhi should be around 40, so, that makes it even riskier. Also, the whole plot of Pakhi conceiving kind of made no sense to me, not just scientifically...but also, emotionally/behavior-wise. Pakhi and Virat are old. Perhaps not entirely uncle-aunties, but still considerably old. It felt creepy seeing so many people being so interested in their sex life.😵

As for the rest, yup, I totally agree. As I said, in real life, it should be fairly easy for Sai to prove herself innocent in this scenario. Even with the 'family' factor, the entire thing not only must have been written in her medical file, but the assistants can also easily act as witnesses. Moreover, Pakhi going on the trip, in my opinion, can be a major proof of her carelessness, and there must be flight tickets or something to prove that.

But again...none of this will happen...so, yeah...time to say our remaining brain cells goodbye.

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Exactly this! 😆

I kid you not. Whenever Ghum has a legal track, I can FEEL my brain cells dying.

Originally posted by: ShipIsSailing

I kid you not. Whenever Ghum has a legal track, I can FEEL my brain cells dying.

Only legal track? My daily ritual before I click on "Watch new Episode" on Ghum...

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Exactly this! 😆

I was looking at it as a malpractice case which comes naturally. Not as ghum story, logic really. I watch ghum episodically & just for scenes I like. I don’t care what Virat did before trying to fix Sai’s gajra. If Neil & Ayesha with kids make scene look good, that’s what I care/ 🤣🤣

BTW medically Patralekha is capable of conceiving a child. Actually lot of woman do have one at her age. She was 26 when the show started. Even with 5 years of Sais education plus 8 years leap put her to be 40. That’s not unusual. With women concentrating on education & career woman starting family in late 30s or 40s is not uncommon. It will be risky but not impossible. Woman is capable of conceiving till she has menopause, average age for it is 51

Originally posted by: -honeydew-

-One more thing- in her defence Sai can always say she went ahead with the surrogacy of her child endangering his life which lead him to be born with weak legs despite her warning her and filing a case against PL for doing all this, and that she always had a weak uterus to begin with because of her own stupidity back then which was illegal. Wonder if that issue will be brought up now - but that will surely act as a protective defence in favour of Sai.

Yes they can show uterus removal because of illegal surrogacy actually through this case they can show justice to sai this this the time to open P's past crime

Originally posted by: LadyD

I was looking at it as a malpractice case which comes naturally. Not as ghum story, logic really. I watch ghum episodically & just for scenes I like. I don’t care what Virat did before trying to fix Sai’s gajra. If Neil & Ayesha with kids make scene look good, that’s what I care/ 🤣🤣

BTW medically Patralekha is capable of conceiving a child. Actually lot of woman do have one at her age. She was 26 when the show started. Even with 5 years of Sais education plus 8 years leap put her to be 40. That’s not unusual. With women concentrating on education & career woman starting family in late 30s or 40s is not uncommon. It will be risky but not impossible. Woman is capable of conceiving till she has menopause, average age for it is 51

Patru needs to get a uterus transplant for that

Yeh kenil inlogo ke reels banane aata hai .. choreography toh bilkul bakwas karta hai