GHKPM Social media update thread #44 - Page 22

Originally posted by: mysticriver

What is being discussed. Can u update the lines? Who's speaking... I don't wanna watch the video 😂

Sai said that both virat and Patralekha involved in illegal surrogacy. She was arrested under cheating case and its proved with all evidence...Virat also suspended.

Last week, sai and virat convo also they edited sai stating why Patralekha became surrogate, how she tricked and fooled everyone.

I really hate this editing team...

Originally posted by: Thanuj

Sai said that both virat and Patralekha involved in illegal surrogacy. She was arrested under cheating case and its proved with all evidence...Virat also suspended.

Last week, sai and virat convo also they edited sai stating why Patralekha became surrogate, how she tricked and fooled everyone.

I really hate this editing team...

What does he say & reaction to Sai's words...

Last week kaunsa convo?

Originally posted by: scarlett22

I don't understand though. One of their writers must be writing the dialogues, why edit them out?!

This lady has contacts everywhere. Even many Sai Virat scenes were edited before also that were shown n sbb.

And why does she keep an innocent face as if her twin sister did all the kand everytime.

This surrogacy discussion happened when Sai and V were walking in yesterday s episode. That also they cut.

If they r going to cut then why shoot it and waste actors time .

Virat is a horrible guy. Never supported Sai earlier also, during Pulkit case and Sai s earlier pregnancy.

But when P s delivery and all full support. Blood boils to see Virat supporting that lady. She will never leave the show and keep hanging around Virat and hence Sai.

its immaterial that Sai mentioned it - because V and judge both have glossed over it. V ignores the mention of illegal surrogacy allegations and instead talks about Sai keeping the truth of Savi. If even now he doesnt understand why she left and why she never returned then what can one say! and judge doesnt seem to care that VP have a criminal record, rather he is giving priveleges because V is "DCP" apparently. Sai had told the lawyer that she never consented for adoption- that point was also omitted. P having a gun and firing it has also been omitted. Its all BS.

Originally posted by: Nja91

its immaterial that Sai mentioned it - because V and judge both have glossed over it. V ignores the mention of illegal surrogacy allegations and instead talks about Sai keeping the truth of Savi. If even now he doesnt understand why she left and why she never returned then what can one say! and judge doesnt seem to care that VP have a criminal record, rather he is giving priveleges because V is "DCP" apparently. Sai had told the lawyer that she never consented for adoption- that point was also omitted. P having a gun and firing it has also been omitted. Its all BS.

agree patralekha stealing a gun and firing .. is enough to revoke her adoption rights .. but it has not been mentioned

Everytime Sai mentions all the stuff he has done, he keeps face as if he didn't do them.

She told him a few times that u snatched Vinu from me and u chose P. Only when Karishma told he felt for a few minutes and after that nothing.

Makers are making her waste her energy.

He doesn't want to give any explanations to Sai.

But for P he gives detailed explanations for every line she says and so there are lot of discussions among them.

and what its doing is making Sai look bad. If she is keen to have Vinu she should be raking up every thing she can to get his custody. And its not even like she is lying. She has witnesses and evidence for that. Infact V and P themselves will not be able to refute it unless they blatantly lie. So if Sai forgets to talk about all the things that make them unfit , thats on her. Theres no way a judge will leave the decision up to Vinu if VP have such a terrible track record. Infact she should even rake up khandaan ke kaarname with respect to pullu/devi, harinee and even getting her deliberately drunk at the party, etc etc etc to prove that CN as a whole in unsafe for a child. Why should she bow down? Infact it would make more sense to show that the judge was bribed by BK and therefore Sai loses despite having such a strong case and V,P are also shocked that they win case and because Sai is now on a mission to expose BK "buying" the judge, BK herself pretends to melt and brings Sai home to be with Vinu to distract her from exposing her corrupt deeds and Sai also takes that chance to be close to Vinu and also gather even more evidence against BKs corruption.

.

.

Originally posted by: Rosyme

.

Though this outfit is similar to the one she wore in the cafe scene it's far better than that one. This color also suits her the most.