As far as I remember, exact age is not mentioned. But from my deduction, he is around 44-45 to her early 20s. And yes, it IS supposed to be a relatively more age-gap love story.
Bimla's pita tulya, getting Vidhi to address him uncle, chachi saying buddha - these dialogues have crossed the line. There is no question about it. Writers need to be careful on what they want to show and convey. Hope they correct themselves and get on the right track before we all reach the stage of "dil negative ho chuka hoga"
Exactly ...the basic concept is finding love that goes beyond limitations of age ... i.e. why it's "na umr ki seema ho" ...it has to be how Dev-Vidhi find compatability among themselves, how they have a love story of their own inspite of age difference, how they cope up with issues that will pop up in their relationship...
Story's main focus is not seeking societal validation...we all know Society has its own view points on such relations and they are not very welcoming abt it.
Agreed a little opposition from parents side is expected... like tomorrow I say I want to marry a 40+ guy...my parents will think twice before saying Yes...but if other factors work in relationship, two ppl involved are sure enough that they can work it out...it's for them to decide. There is no need to insult the couple involved.
Showing age-gap love story is not new or unheard concept we had seen shows & films on concept...I think years back there was Kasam Se and even the medical drama Kuch toh log kahenge...I didn't followed them till end, but I don't think they ever went on beti-angle...atleast till the point I watched them.
Vidhi calling Uncleji, in first epi was forgivable it was a one time innocent thing ... even in real, we do end up mistakenly calling someone Aunty or Uncle...but now consistently referring Dev as Budhha sounds bitter 🥺and somewhere it effects the connection we have with Dev-Vidhi as couple.
Anupamaa
