New Promo - reactions - Page 3

Originally posted by: Kumuda-123

Even before he saw jagtap, he blamed her for vinu death, labelled her as bad mother.

Jagtap thing was just additional reason for his anger.

No way he will stop using vinu death against her with or without jagtap angle.

The fact that he knew devkit marriage brought devi happiness yet he brings that to humiliate her every time.

It shows the way he holds grudge against her, he still holds grudge against her for doing neighborhood drama and insulting his family. He never forget to mention that while talking about devkit marriage. So his main issue was sai insulting him in public. By over looking his own insults like calling her mad infront of everyone.

He didn't think before calling her orphan too and didn't even regret it.

He never included sai in his family cycle. That's why never stopped his family insulting her by calling her orphan.

He has this arrogance that she is orphan, so she should be grateful to me and my family.

Yes. He did blame her for losing Vinu. But I'm saying it wasn't his trigger point atleast what they've been shown in the show. If I remember correctly in Kankavali he had started to lean & melt towards Sai a bit until the jagtap thing he saw and started thinking Jags and Sai are item together. There was huge difference in his behaviour with Pakhi before and after he came to conclusions of Sai's affair with Jags. He didn't think of Pakhi for once at all in Kankavali, used to cut her call, never called or informed her anything by his own in Kankavali. Fact is he had no plan ever to reveal truth about Sai's being alive to Pakhi or CN. Hypothetically speaking but for sure he'd have made visits at Kankavali under pretext of Vinu's treatment to get in touch with Sai if not for Jagtap MU. Probably would've tried getting close with Sai too by then after few days over there. So far what they've shown it didn't even bother him that Sai had child with another man, he infact was emotional in a good way hearing Sai gave birth to a child, they keep showing in his monologues, FBs, conversation with Pakhi they're only emphasizing on him getting triggered & acting like this only due to Jagtap. He admitted himself he loses his temper everytime he thinks Sai being with Jagtap.

Originally posted by: xfiles

They have written post leap Virat’s character in the most twisted and illogical way that viewers cannot connect with him even one percent. This is a totally different Virat from before!

Even TRP aunties will lose interest even if they serve truckloads of toxicity.

ML character has lost all credibility and sensibility.

If they don’t write him differently aunties will switch channels soon. They are not Stupid to accept this illogical nonsense!

Stupidity ka bhi ek seema hoti hain 🙄

Why did he want only pakhi as surrogate despite knowing she is not legally suitable.

Why did he never show any interest in finding the goons who attacked his wife.

Why he was so defensive whenever sai mentioned it could be pakhi who sent goons

Why did he was against the idea of sai taking sign from pakhi for baby

How could he easily believe pakhi claims of sai trying to hurt her baby. Does he think such low of the woman who he claims to love?

Why he didn't correct doctor when she addressed pakhi as his wife.

Why he was so calm when pakhi asked him for a hug by saying she misses her late husband.

Why the hell he bailed pakhi after promising sai he will stand by her decision.

Ok he did it for so called family sake.

But sai asked him to sent pakhi her home, for that too he didn't agree. For what?

Can't he convince his family by saying he will bail pakhi but she won't stay in this house.

Why he was hell bent on keeping pakhi in house at the cost of sai and his son despite knowing pakhi crimes.

Even a character does wrong things there should be some reason behind it.

But his actions don't even have any reason to react that way.

He literally has no character

Originally posted by: mysticriver

Yes. He did blame her for losing Vinu. But I'm saying it wasn't his trigger point atleast what they've been shown in the show. If I remember correctly in Kankavali he had started to lean & melt towards Sai a bit until the jagtap thing he saw and started thinking Jags and Sai are item together. There was huge difference in his behaviour with Pakhi before and after he came to conclusions of Sai's affair with Jags. He didn't think of Pakhi for once at all in Kankavali, used to cut her call, never called or informed her anything by his own in Kankavali. Fact is he had no plan ever to reveal truth about Sai's being alive to Pakhi or CN. Hypothetically speaking but for sure he'd have made visits at Kankavali under pretext of Vinu's treatment to get in touch with Sai if not for Jagtap MU. Probably would've tried getting close with Sai too by then after few days over there. So far what they've shown it didn't even bother him that Sai had child with another man, he infact was emotional in a good way hearing Sai gave birth to a child, they keep showing in his monologues, FBs, conversation with Pakhi they're only emphasizing on him getting triggered & acting like this only due to Jagtap. He admitted himself he loses his temper everytime he thinks Sai being with Jagtap.

Originally posted by: xfiles

In that case, if Jagtap was not in the pic, what was his brilliant plan ? Apologize to Sai? Accept her back in his life? Divorce Paki? This guy has no clue how to run his life , never had a clue even before. Virat is one big confused soul with no brains!

He'd be having affair with Sai behind Pakhi's back without divorcing her. He'd not have shared things with Sai either or maybe to gauge her reaction to know if she still loves him or not. He has no morals whatsoever.

guys these promos only bamokesh bakhi ,james bond and Feluda can solve

Its not our cup of tea..

Instead of making such jigsaw puzzle promos should focus on the script and add some crisp instead devar bhabi cringe..

Isme predict karneko kuch hai hi nehi..

Originally posted by: mysticriver

Yes. He did blame her for losing Vinu. But I'm saying it wasn't his trigger point atleast what they've been shown in the show. If I remember correctly in Kankavali he had started to lean & melt towards Sai a bit until the jagtap thing he saw and started thinking Jags and Sai are item together. There was huge difference in his behaviour with Pakhi before and after he came to conclusions of Sai's affair with Jags. He didn't think of Pakhi for once at all in Kankavali, used to cut her call, never called or informed her anything by his own in Kankavali. Fact is he had no plan ever to reveal truth about Sai's being alive to Pakhi or CN. Hypothetically speaking but for sure he'd have made visits at Kankavali under pretext of Vinu's treatment to get in touch with Sai if not for Jagtap MU. Probably would've tried getting close with Sai too by then after few days over there. So far what they've shown it didn't even bother him that Sai had child with another man, he infact was emotional in a good way hearing Sai gave birth to a child, they keep showing in his monologues, FBs, conversation with Pakhi they're only emphasizing on him getting triggered & acting like this only due to Jagtap. He admitted himself he loses his temper everytime he thinks Sai being with Jagtap.

Though I don't think his feeding pakhi, anniversary closeness(even before sai arrival in CN), scene on bed with vinu has anything to do with sai or jagtap.

If has any feelings for sai, but want to hurt her due to jagtap he would be close to pakhi only infront of her not in private. His close moments with pakhi in private makes no sense if they want to sell the narrative that he loves sai.

If their intention is to show virat forcibly trying to move on with pakhi after seeing jagtap then where is his monologue stating that? How one supposed to see his both emotional and physical intimacy with pakhi? He saw sai with jagtap only twice but the amount of close scenes between him and pakhi is huge.

Even while sai playing sita, he didn't show any emotions like softness, getting lost etc. It was a simple play for him.

Leena ji never tried to make a hero or adarsh purush out of Rono. He was what he was. He was a terrible husband but as a man, was not morally corrupt.

In ghum, Virat is morally bankrupt. On top of that, they project him as hero material.

In Ramleela scene, when Luv asks Ram why he left his wife, Ram answers that as a king, he has to give up his personal interest and do his duty to his kingdom...the camera then pans to Sai's face. I felt it was an equivalent statement by the makers - that Virat took his decision for his extended family..that led to him sacrificing his own young family. The way a crime is being projected as familial duty.

In DABH, there is a separation based on the same concept. The ML's mother becomes a target of hijacking because she is associated with the FL (who is an IPS officer). ML breaks off relations with his wife. FL doesn't beg..she walks off. After months/years he realizes what he has put his wife through...and with the same reference of Ram & Sita...ML apologizes to FL on national TV and puts a question why only women have to give agni pariksha for their loyalty & love. That ML was also projected as a hero....but he never supported criminal activities. I used to hate that show the...looks like gold now after watching ghum.

Surrogacy+separation could have been written as a combination of bad decisions + unfortunate circumstances. Instead they made ML an active participant in a crime..and what's worse made FL accept the crime for the longest time. What kind of a message is this?

Originally posted by: Kumuda-123

Yeah his trigger may be jagtap to get close to pakhi. But don't think he would have behaved any good with sai knowing the way he reacted after seeing her alive.

Though I don't think his feeding pakhi, anniversary closeness(even before sai arrival in CN), scene on bed with vinu has anything to do with sai or jagtap.

If has any feelings for sai, but want to hurt her due to jagtap he would be close to pakhi only infront of her not in private. His close moments with pakhi in private makes no sense if they want to sell the narrative that he loves sai.

If their intention is to show virat forcibly trying to move on with pakhi after seeing jagtap then where is his monologue stating that? How one supposed to see his both emotional and physical intimacy with pakhi? He saw sai with jagtap only twice but the amount of close scenes between him and pakhi is huge.

Even while sai playing sita, he didn't show any emotions like softness, getting lost etc. It was a simple play for him.

His immediate was like that but gradually he was calming down. I feel if it had been someone else instead of Pakhi people would've felt bad for Virat's current wife with the way he was neglecting her at Kankavali before her arrival.

Yes But there's a reason why he'd show it off to Sai if he doesn't expect a reaction out of her, someone tries to hurt or make jealous if he or she feels the same way. Also, not sure if Pakhi is so special to him he forgets her birthday, their anniversary. Both things he was informed by others. Everytime he took step forward towards Pakhi it was something triggered by Sai.

They don't show too much of his thoughts regarding his feelings for Sai. That's the problem idk why they do that. They did the same post Shruti track. Also, Neil's acting doesn't help much either. He's inconsistent af. Tho there were scenes in anniversary he was affected with Sai's behaviour when she was eating the cake, her indifference & thinks seeing him with P doesn't affect her like he gets affected with seeing her with Jagtap. He probably would've reacted angrily with someone else too but with Jagtap it's more to do with Jagtap had eyes on Sai shuru se. Him saying about he's Sai's dad's & Samrat's murderer isn't the main reason. He doesn't even remember Samrat unless for this or if he cared so much he'd not be marrying Pakhi or thought of doing these stunts. His clear emotions came to display in the bedroom conversation with Pakhi during anniversary when Pakhi made him confront & face his real emotions, feelings. Later, Pakhi's confession had no impact on him. He was upset & pondering why Sai isn't upset seeing him and Pakhi together, also mockingly said "happy anniversary' to himself remembering Sai's wish and fixing that photoframe. So it was like he had real emotions over celebrating that sham of a marriage anniversary with P but they toy around with his character way too much wrt Pakhi or Shruti so I've stopped decoding his ckt, anything related to him.

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

Leena ji never tried to make a hero or adarsh purush out of Rono. He was what he was. He was a terrible husband but as a man, was not morally corrupt.

In ghum, Virat is morally bankrupt. On top of that, they project him as hero material.

In Ramleela scene, when Luv asks Ram why he left his wife, Ram answers that as a king, he has to give up his personal interest and do his duty to his kingdom...the camera then pans to Sai's face. I felt it was an equivalent statement by the makers - that Virat took his decision for his extended family..that led to him sacrificing his own young family. The way a crime is being projected as familial duty.

In DABH, there is a separation based on the same concept. The ML's mother becomes a target of hijacking because she is associated with the FL (who is an IPS officer). ML breaks off relations with his wife. FL doesn't beg..she walks off. After months/years he realizes what he has put his wife through...and with the same reference of Ram & Sita...ML apologizes to FL on national TV and puts a question why only women have to give agni pariksha for their loyalty & love. That ML was also projected as a hero....but he never supported criminal activities. I used to hate that show the...looks like gold now after watching ghum.

Surrogacy+separation could have been written as a combination of bad decisions + unfortunate circumstances. Instead they made ML an active participant in a crime..and what's worse made FL accept the crime for the longest time. What kind of a message is this?

For example.

Rono as a character don't mind breaking law for his personal reasons.

He did in shruti track.

When emon got accused of false charges, he was in a position to arrest emon, but his first instinct was to ask emon to run away in order to avoid her staying in jail.

So his character of going against law for personal reasons stays intact.

While virat don't mind going against law for his family,shruti, pakhi.

But when it comes to sai, he suddenly remembers farz crap. When he was put in a situation to arrest sai, he didn't think twice about other alternatives, immediately arrested her. Atleast he could have avoided hand cuffs. But he hand cuffed her and dragged her to jeep as a criminal.

Not only he made her stay in jail, he allowed pakhi, kaku to insult her in police station which rono would never allow.

Ironically even after saving criminals, doing crimes, virat is projected as some ideal police man.

Even in recent track, he was hailed publicly just for doing his police job while sai was sidelined when she should be the one to get the credit for risking her life despite being a member of public not any special officer like virat.

In kd if rono had facilitations for his job, emon too had equal no of facilitations as successful doctor.

While sai was shown as social servicer who don't even have proper job when other hand virat,pakhi, kaku are successful in their career.

Ghum narrative is mysogynist while kd narrative is harsh reality.

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

Leena ji never tried to make a hero or adarsh purush out of Rono. He was what he was. He was a terrible husband but as a man, was not morally corrupt.

In ghum, Virat is morally bankrupt. On top of that, they project him as hero material.

In Ramleela scene, when Luv asks Ram why he left his wife, Ram answers that as a king, he has to give up his personal interest and do his duty to his kingdom...the camera then pans to Sai's face. I felt it was an equivalent statement by the makers - that Virat took his decision for his extended family..that led to him sacrificing his own young family. The way a crime is being projected as familial duty.

In DABH, there is a separation based on the same concept. The ML's mother becomes a target of hijacking because she is associated with the FL (who is an IPS officer). ML breaks off relations with his wife. FL doesn't beg..she walks off. After months/years he realizes what he has put his wife through...and with the same reference of Ram & Sita...ML apologizes to FL on national TV and puts a question why only women have to give agni pariksha for their loyalty & love. That ML was also projected as a hero....but he never supported criminal activities. I used to hate that show the...looks like gold now after watching ghum.

Surrogacy+separation could have been written as a combination of bad decisions + unfortunate circumstances. Instead they made ML an active participant in a crime..and what's worse made FL accept the crime for the longest time. What kind of a message is this?

As i said vanker is only focusing on increase number of episodes rather quality..All characters are mere machines void from human emotions except Sai..Though she has turned so white unlike leena's version..Emon was more human..

No show till now ever white washed ML for sever crimes..

I watched the part in DABH..Suraj was really tormented after sending out sandhaya..He was kept on looking at her wound in one scene..His mother made the first attempt to reconcile them..

Raman was very toxic..His only issue was Ishita's goddess complex..His whole world revolved around ishita and his kids..A genuine family man..