SAI PAKHI PROMO - MONTAGE CHANGED - Page 9

My interpretation of new montage with size increase

It’s a triangle with each of them in one corner and center mei burning rose. They are each side of a 3d model of a triangle.

everyone is facing diff directions, all of their love is burning right now, no one is happy

Old one had a significant tilt toward V and S, saying they will be happy or together.

Verdict : aesthetically the new one looks so bad and overcrowded.

If Vinu's identity is revealed with P unaware of his identity, it will not be all rosy either. Yes, Sai will have a right on him as a mother. But, she will be the reason for ghar ka chirag ending up in orphanage, whereas P will be the reason he came back to CN. Sai will be aai but P might still be mumma. P's contribution for giving birth and raising Vinu will still have a part.

If Vinu's identity is revealed with P being aware of it, then it will be a different story. Sai will still be blamed for Vinu ending up in orphanage, unless P has a hand in that too. But The Chavan's will not be happy P hid their chirag right in front of their eyes when they thought he died. They will feel cheated and finally realize they have been played. P will lose everything then.

Please stop freaking out everyone...

Montage is not changed as you are predicting....

The only thing that is different is P ka size and rose ka size.

V and Sai ka size is same... they have only slightly shifted apart to accomodate the increased size of rose and P ka picture. It is the rose which has shifted towards Sai...

Let me clear what I had mentioned in previous analysis. To those who don't know, my education pertains to this visual composition aspect. So it's not my random analysis.. 😆

The channel has a semi transparent title card on the left of the panel. So any character which is on that side will have less of importance because it is partially hidden -V

The character on the right is the most important-Sai. Also the character who 'is' RIGHT.

The character or object in the centre is the one which draws your eyes in... - Rose and P... The burning rose ... symbolic of a love between two characters and which is at the moment in trouble. But it's there.

Below the rose is a character who will be catalyst... in this case P... she will have a prominent role than before... thats sure... what is important is where she is looking.... she is looking towards Sai... so the viewers gaze is automatically shifted to that object or that character. P is going to be watching Sai, will be after Sai and influencing Sai.

Contrast this to the previous montage where P was looking at V.

Then V was important to her... now she has focused her attention on Sai.

V is in the background, partially hidden by P... also signifying that he is under control of P or in this case tied to P by marriage. Until he takes a step ahead or removes those shackles, he will not be so important to the proceedings.

Relate this to the promo ... P wants something from Sai. V doesn't feature in this promo. He is not relevant 🤪

The tussle will be between P and Sai... V will not have much role.

The rose based on whichever interpretation anyone wants to side on... if this is PakRat then Sai need not matter... she would have been relegated to lesser position which has not happened.

So the rose is still symbolic of SaiRat love and it has shifted towards Sai slightly... does it mean V is turning towards her? Maybe... and does it mean P will try to burn it down.. absolutely yes...

It's a 2 parivar story with the fight between P and Sai.

Sai is stern and doesn't want to be part of it but P will pull her in it... kyunki hum kitni bhi koshish karle.... beeta hua Kal Hamara picha nahi chodhta.

Hey general question moor....

Why do people use concepts of visual composition in design?

As a layman (and an unobservant one at that🤪) all I'll think looking at the montage is there are three people who are part of the plot - either a love triangle or a third person in between two people, there is a burning rose which must mean either a love story in trouble or a love-hate relationship. Isse zyada samajhne ke liye mujhe khud visual composition padhne hoga na?😆

PS: Not putting down any profession or their work...I'm sure there must be a reason for everything....I am just curious

Thank you for tagging. As far as promo is concerned, have we for once thought ki probably they realised that they are giving away plot by making Patralekha small size so now they are like hey! Let’s confuse them again.

Also, that was star plus ka promotion, tweet, let’s see when they change it on the show ka banner. Aaj samjhega. And if not Aaj, Monday Tuesday

Read all your analysis. Loved it. I am right now interested in knowing what is the trigger that will make Sai leave kankavli and go to Chavan Niwas. Sometimes I used to feel it could be Savi’s paternity reveal but most of the guys don’t feel so. So I chucked it. To take such a decision to go back to that hell-hole, there needs to be a trigger.

I blindly assume things nutty says! She knows it all 🙌

I don’t fit in iTv. 😢

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

Hey general question moor....

Why do people use concepts of visual composition in design?

As a layman (and an unobservant one at that🤪) all I'll think looking at the montage is there are three people who are part of the plot - either a love triangle or a third person in between two people, there is a burning rose which must mean either a love story in trouble or a love-hate relationship. Isse zyada samajhne ke liye mujhe khud visual composition padhne hoga na?😆

PS: Not putting down any profession or their work...I'm sure there must be a reason for everything....I am just curious

Do you remember my previous thread on holika dahan and tum tak?

If not... will tag you there.

The concept of Visual communication is important when its a graphical medium. There are no dialogues or no music to convey the story. So as you rightly said ...there are three people in the story... but how to stress who is important or what's the story even???

That's when we use elements of design. And this is the base. I mean the elements are same. The medium differs. As architects we use to stress importance to specific elements of physical design in our buildings... in advertising to sell the product, in art to intrigue the viewer. So on and so forth. Basically any medium which has to work standalone and which doesn't have anyone to speak for it. Visual design is a silent voice. It has to speak for itself and left for the viewer to interpret. 👍🏼

From what I know Anupama ka montage is only her.. there's no Anuj or Vanraj in the montage. Which clearly says that she is the only important character. Rest all are superficial. Same happened with Imlie I guess when Aditya was removed from the show and Aryan had not come in. For a period of time, it was only Imlie ka story.

So the viewer who was attached to only Anuj/Aditya will skip it 😆... and viewers who love Aryan will be watching on repeat 🤪

Second comment on this page where I described the elements of design.😳

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/ghum-hai-kisikey-pyaar-meiin/5289458/ghum-and-art-of-film-making?pn=2

Yes I remember the tum Tak analysis(edited: ok I am talking about the Holika Dahan episode actually; I'll read the tum Tak 👍🏼)...that I understood for most part...it was all about directing the viewer to what they wanted...so that made sense

See I get the importance of the relative size of the characters in a montage....but the placement (right or left) etc ...does the human brain really perceive it differently?