🛒🏏IPL Day 2:Owners Bidding Spree & Players' Animated Suspense 🏏🛒 - Page 10

Created

Last reply

Replies

831

Views

20.5k

Users

25

Likes

1.2k

Frequent Posters

Posted: 4 years ago
#91

Thanks for tag Madhu di. Watching replay of day 1πŸ˜†

Viswasruti thumbnail

Rajasthan Royals

Posted: 4 years ago
#92

<div class="paragraphs"><p>Each team needs to have a minimum of 18 players and a maximum of 25 players in their squad.</p></div>

Bengaluru saw ten teams battle it out in bidding wars to pick the best cricketing talent from India and across the world in their squads.

A total of 74 players were sold on Day 1 with Rs 388 crore being spent by the 10 IPL franchises.

Sunrisers Hyderabad made the most buys on the day, adding 10 players to their line-up, but they still have another Rs 20.15 crore left to spend on Sunday.

Mumbai Indians bought only four players, to add to the four they retained, and go into Day 2 with Rs 27.85 crore left to buy the rest of their squad. Remember, it is compulsory for each team must have a minimum of 18 and maximum of 25 players.

While there is a spending cap of Rs 90 crore, teams have also been informed that they must spend a minimum of Rs 67.5 crore.

Viswasruti thumbnail

Rajasthan Royals

Posted: 4 years ago
#93

Originally posted by: SoniRSippu21

Thanks for tag Madhu di. Watching replay of day 1πŸ˜†

Changed the caption. Let us continue our discussions in this thread. πŸ˜ƒ
GuardianDevil thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 4 years ago
#94

Kedar Jadhav should retire now πŸ™„πŸ˜’ He was such a big liability for CSK in 2020 IPL. And even with SRH he played no better.

Viswasruti thumbnail

Rajasthan Royals

Posted: 4 years ago
#96


Avesh Khan became the most expensive uncapped player in the history of the IPL when Lucknow Super Giants acquired his services for Rs 10 crore. The 10 IPL franchises have so far spent above Rs 388 crore collectively to buy 74 players out of which 20 are overseas recruits. There were 20 players who got more than USD 1 million (Rs 7.53 crore as per Saturday's exchange rates).

Viswasruti thumbnail

Rajasthan Royals

Posted: 4 years ago
#99

Why did Ishan Kishan go for Rs 15.25 crore?

A current India player and also a wicket-keeper. Can win matches single-handedly and, at 24, has age on his side. A part of MI's batting core. With 48 crore available, they could have gone for only one big India player. With matches at Wankhede and short boundaries, Kishan is the man to watch out for.

Why did CSK pay Rs 14 crore for Deepak Chahar?

CSK had to go the distance for one among Deepak Chahar and Shardul Thakur, both blessed with multiple skill sets. Chahar with his impeccable power-play wicket-taking ability and being a part of CSK's set template of experienced players was a no-brainer. Once they took Chahar, they couldn't have possibly gone for Shardul. However, CSK still looks short on the express pace department but MS Dhoni will manage it.

Why did Nicholas Pooran and Jonny Bairstow get big deals and Matthew Wade went unsold?

Most among the 10 teams needed wicket-keepers. Pooran had a horrendous last IPL but is still considered among one of the biggest T20 hitters plus a safe gloveman, and at times, a brilliant outfielder. It also had a lot do with the kind of purse that SRH and Punjab Kings had, which certainly inflated his bid.

Matthew Wade, who played a blinder in the T20 World Cup semi-final against Pakistan, isn't the best player of spin bowling on sluggish surfaces, and hence, Bairstow, who has shown his IPL wares, got a deal.

Why so many foreign fast bowlers with big fat deals?

Most of the teams during retention had shored up their batting, and hence, always had to depend on auction for quick bowlers. So a Lockie Ferguson and Prasidh Krishna fetched more than Trent Boult at the auction.

It also had a lot to do with Boult coming in a marquee set at the start and the likes of Lockie, Josh Hazlewood coming later in the fast bowlers' set. Kagiso Rabada also went for more than a million dollars as he would have in the first place.

Avesh Khan and Harshal Patel were rewarded for their great show last year and they have been regularly playing domestic cricket. Kartik Tyagi, Shivam Mavi all earned their stripes for raw pace despite not even remotely being in India contention as of now.

Why did KKR spend 12.25 crore on Shreyas Iyer?

KKR were looking at two things: a solid top-order, preferably No. 3 or 4 batter and also a proven captaincy material. With must of the top Indian batters not available, Iyer would have cost a bomb and he did indeed.

Which team was most impressive in its choice of players?

Delhi Capitals, despite losing a lot of their core players, did a fine job by getting David Warner for less than Rs 7 crore. A Warner-Prithvi Shaw opening combination looks the most destructive. Getting a Mitchell Marsh for less than 7 crore was also a bargain and so was Sarafaraz Khan at a base price of Rs 20 lakh and Kuldeep Yadav for Rs 2 crore.

Which franchise looked the least impressive with their buys?

While Lucknow Supergiants were really impressive in their maiden season (although they had come in as Pune earlier), Gujarat Lions' picks defied logic. They haven't yet picked a wicketkeeper and even KS Bharath is sold out. Giving 9 crore to Rahul Tewatia, a one-match wonder of Sharjah, was baffling. He isn't a consistent performer.

Which franchise looks to have a good spin attack?

Rajasthan Royals with Ravichandran Ashwin and Yuzvendra Chahal look to have a very good spin attack for Indian conditions.

What happens to Cheteshwar Pujara, Ajinkya Rahane and Ishant Sharma?

Pujara and Rahane are slotted at Nos 103 and 104, respectively, while Ishant is at 124 in the list. They will all come in today, but they are lower priority as per the franchise's demand for players. Rahane might be taken by CSK for his experience.

Viswasruti thumbnail

Rajasthan Royals

Posted: 4 years ago

Today, a lot of players will go for a low bidding price as most franchises have exhausted their purses to buy first-team players. Teams like KKR need to buy at least nine more players (for a minimum squad of 18) and only have 12 crores to spend. So these guys won't be attracting great bids.

Related Topics

Indian Premier League thumbnail

Posted by: Viswasruti Β· 1 months ago

Thala’s keeping the yellow faithful on their toes no retirement bell just yet, because MS Dhoni is back for another IPL dance. Chennai Super...

Expand β–Ό
Indian Premier League thumbnail

Posted by: PunnyPotato Β· 1 months ago

Mark your calendars β€” IPL 2026 begins on 28 March 2026 and will conclude on 31 May 2026.

Expand β–Ό
Indian Premier League thumbnail

Posted by: Viswasruti Β· 22 days ago

Tata IPL 2026: Ishan Kishan likely to lead SRH...

Expand β–Ό
Indian Premier League thumbnail

Posted by: Viswasruti Β· 25 days ago

IPL 2026 schedule - Phase one match list As per the IPL 2026 schedule announced on Wednesday, reigning champions Royal Challengers Bengaluru...

Expand β–Ό
Indian Premier League thumbnail

Posted by: missFiesty_69 Β· 25 days ago

https://www.timesnownews.com/sports/cricket/bcci-sets-strict-rules-for-all-10-teams-ahead-of-ipl-2026-season-article-153825523/amp

Expand β–Ό
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".