Originally posted by: sadiltl
Sorry I am genuinely trying to understand here. Leave ghum or Virat. Do you think Rono is written like this? I mean the script is to show a person like rono who will marry one girl and tie other women to him?
Then why to make him a hero in first place and invest a whole year of story on his love for emon? Because the KD synopsis says entirely different! Yes rono/virat did cross lines and were abusive towards emon/sai. But where did the story or the writing say directly that he is this kind of a man!
because if that is the case, all my (entire audience’s)one year worth of understanding is a waste right? Or vankar’s story is a farce. If we agree that the story is farce then no point seeing it right? Sorry I m lost.
It's difficult to compare rono and virat. Because rono didn't crossed physical boundaries with other woman like virat does. Who will hold ex hands infront of everyone just to stop her from talking,that too very knowing what that ex expects from him, who will stop ex by holding her hands instead of enjoying the first hug he got from his wife whom he claims to love when the minute before she just talked about their past. Who will break the hug with his wife by seeing his ex. He could have put full stop to pakhi obsession by easily admitting the fact when sai confronted him infront of everyone instead he choosed to make sai a liar and let her called names like shameless,nurse. Let's say he is protecting pakhi dignity for samrat sake. But what's the need to pretend like he don't know pakhi intentions and they share sacred relationship. Despite knowing what kind of woman pakhi is, he joined her to insult sai, he compared sai with pakhi, after that lifting scene when sai warned about pakhi intentions he blamed sai back, defended pakhi as if he don't know what she wants. Now to shruti he shamelessly saying I know why pakhi behaving like this. So when you know her intentions then what is the need to maintain fake facade infront of sai and others. He didn't let even sunny rebuke pakhi for ruining samrat life. If he wanted he could have warned pakhi by saying if she makes any move on him or insult sai he will reveal her intentions infront of everyone. Did he say anything like that? No. His I love sai, stay away from me dialogues are so inconsistent. Whenever someone says anything to pakhi, she looks at virat for defense. Why? Because that's how strongly he reacts to protect her dignity at the cost of making others liers. He says I love sai to pakhi,next minute gangs up with her to insult sai, talks sweetly with her, let's her enter his personal space. So why would she take his stay away from me dialogues seriously. Same with Shruti, he didn't let her take care of him when he was sick, but let her enter his room, sit on his room, have the comfortableness to change shirt infront of her. She saw how virat bitches about his wife. Today she has the audacity to blame sai because of virat. He himself told her how stubborn sai is, how she never loved him, how she always doubted him, how she don't respect him. Now she is using his own words. Shruti told him to go back to his family, told him to let her work in some NGO, still he isn't letting her go. So why won't she think she has chance with him? What does all these indicates? How one supposed to think he is loyal to sai emotionally when he does such actions. Him getting extreme defensive at shruti and pakhi insult while playing mute during sai insult is the biggest let down point.