:: GHKPM Spoilers Thread :: #5 - Page 82

Originally posted by: dairymilkanu

https://twitter.com/Kavya88698684/status/1491290419950649349?t=hGUvA5st5FqurzX-5QrlwA&s=19

Sorry I am genuinely trying to understand here. Leave ghum or Virat. Do you think Rono is written like this? I mean the script is to show a person like rono who will marry one girl and tie other women to him?

Then why to make him a hero in first place and invest a whole year of story on his love for emon? Because the KD synopsis says entirely different! Yes rono/virat did cross lines and were abusive towards emon/sai. But where did the story or the writing say directly that he is this kind of a man!
because if that is the case, all my (entire audience’s)one year worth of understanding is a waste right? Or vankar’s story is a farce. If we agree that the story is farce then no point seeing it right? Sorry I m lost.

Imagine, old sada in today's Sai-sada scenes.. soch kar bura lag raha hai uske liye🤣😆

Originally posted by: sadiltl

Sorry I am genuinely trying to understand here. Leave ghum or Virat. Do you think Rono is written like this? I mean the script is to show a person like rono who will marry one girl and tie other women to him?

Then why to make him a hero in first place and invest a whole year of story on his love for emon? Because the KD synopsis says entirely different! Yes rono/virat did cross lines and were abusive towards emon/sai. But where did the story or the writing say directly that he is this kind of a man!
because if that is the case, all my (entire audience’s)one year worth of understanding is a waste right? Or vankar’s story is a farce. If we agree that the story is farce then no point seeing it right? Sorry I m lost.

Tagging asmi. I give up yaar. Let me understand the story my way. Because whatever you are saying I didn’t see in KD (till confession) or in ghum.

Originally posted by: sadiltl

Tagging asmi. I give up yaar. Let me understand the story my way. Because whatever you are saying I didn’t see in KD (till confession) or in ghum.

I did not get you, Is it related to my post? Am I hampering the way you view your story, then sorry about that. Will steer clear from commenting or quoting or even reacting to your views. Extremely sorry there dear.

Originally posted by: asmi_joya

I did not get you, Is it related to my post? Am I hampering the way you view your story, then sorry about that. Will steer clear from commenting or quoting or even reacting to your views. Extremely sorry there dear.

No no. I m just saying the way you see the story is completely different from the way I m seeing. That’s all. I say my opinion here what I feel about the story. Never understate others opinion. I m sorry the previous post also, I didn’t say you wrote about virat being pervert. I was trying to say he did not come across anything other than what he said to sruthi. Because you guys have negative opinion on him about him being loose with other women, I used pervert. I m sorry.

All I am saying is if he is not the one that is being shown by the script and dialogues, then why did they waste one year on their live story? Why did KJ found him worthy to take care of his daughter? Why introduce virat as the one that was introduced.? Leave virat, what is leena trying to say? Is my only question.

Yaar in KD Shruti confession happened after Ronno saved Imon & imon drags him to court by filing case against him whereas here they preponed it idk the motive behind this tho.

Originally posted by: Kumuda-123

What is the need to stay with her even after all this. His words never match his actions. That's what makes character questionable. Now why he is still living with her in the name of responsibility? His biggest reason to help her was vaada which is nullied now with sada entry, his logic of protecting sai and family got nullied with sada being alive, nothing changed for him even after knowing sada is alive. He is still playing husband and wife with shruti. For what? When she asks him to go back to his family he gives wtf expressions. What is his plan actually? Shouldn't he move out of that house the next minute when sada clearly mentioned he has problem with them living together, but no he was there fulfilling proxy husband and father duties even after shruti confession. Now sada is asking his wife in exchange of sai, still he won't let shruti go. He did same with pakhi. He could have ended everything by openly admitting truth instead of telling lies like pakhi and he are just friends. But no if whole truth comes in open how can pakhi still pin for him. It just shows he enjoys women attention at the cost of ruining others life. His facade of being moral person stops him from wholly accepting shruti,pakhi. He neither accepts them nor let them go. Sorry to say.

Agree with most of this except the bold part. Bringing Patralekha's truth out will also raise question on him. His image is very important for him. He went to clarify himself to Patralekha even when she is Samrat's would be wife n her haldi is going on. He was 'indifferent' to Sai because she questioned him about Patralekha during anniversary. Now, he left Sai n his family because they questioned his character, n said he will not return to CN even if they want when the truth is out. Can also be because of his non-confrontional or wanting to maintain things the way it is or he naively believes everything will be alright. Thats how I see him.

Originally posted by: sadiltl

No no. I m just saying the way you see the story is completely different from the way I m seeing. That’s all. I say my opinion here what I feel about the story. Never understate others opinion. I m sorry the previous post also, I didn’t say you wrote about virat being pervert. I was trying to say he did not come across anything other than what he said to sruthi. Because you guys have negative opinion on him about him being loose with other women, I used pervert. I m sorry.

All I am saying is if he is not the one that is being shown by the script and dialogues, then why did they waste one year on their live story? Why did KJ found him worthy to take care of his daughter? Why introduce virat as the one that was introduced.? Leave virat, what is leena trying to say? Is my only question.

They dont. They introduced him as a man of principles who spoke about Farz before Jazbaat, about respecting women and all he has done is exactly opposite.

Yes is lose with other women as far as decorum of marriage is concerned. Why would he change his shirt infront of any woman. I did not mind the hug, he was consoling her, its fine. Why would he be fine staying with a married woman all alone in the house, why can he not take up some other house. So yes he loose as far as morals and principals when it comes to a marriage is concerned, reason could be anything, but he is loose there. And he is not a pervert.

Virat is not Leena's version. Rono was far more dignified when it comes to decorum of marriage, He did not like Emon being touched by other men, he maintained that with women in his life, to an extent. and I understood him to an extent. Virat is not Leena's version.

I am sorry asmi! My words didn’t communicate properly on the pervert thing. I apologize 🙏