Will Virat figure out Sai's intention behind divorce? - Page 3

Someone will blurt it out. Sai for sure, Pulkit, DIG, the lawyer will add on.

Virat by himself will never realize it. Usko itna dimaag nahi hain.

How is his non-affair alone enough to prevent divorce though. Also how exactly will they prove there was no affair..... The dna test of the kid may prove that virat is not the father but it would not prove that he didn't have an affair with Shruti. He has publicly claimed shruti as wife in a hotel, stayed overnight with her, registered her as wife in a hospital with people as witness to this....so how is shruti's statement enough to prove a platonic relationship?! She can lie right!

Also even if they somehow prove virat didn't have an affair- Him hiding things so humongous from his wife becomes incompatibility, breach of trust...how can anyone be expected to live with a spouse who is falsifying information about his wife and child in a hospital that too without informing his actual wife... Thats 2 wrongs. Falsifying info. And by lying to his wife about something so major he has definitely committed an act that could warrant the person wanting a divorce. So while "infidelity" cant remain the grounds for divorce, if both parties still want divorce it still needs to be granted right? Mutual consent secondary to incompatibility, breach of trust, yeh sab hai naa as grounds for separation....

Tagging our legal expert too.

Originally posted by: Sagi.

Someone will blurt it out. Sai for sure, Pulkit, DIG, the lawyer will add on.

Virat by himself will never realize it. Usko itna dimaag nahi hain.

I will tell you what will happen. The DIG has hinted on a DNA test. Also hinted that if any of his officers is being framed, then he would find he truth.

And he will, maybe speak to Sai, show her the proof. Also Shruti will tell the DIG about the whole matter. She has already given hints that "Saahas would have been an orphan had anything happened to her.." Means that Virat is nobody to Saahas.

If my instincts are right...these dialogues have been inserted with an intention.

Originally posted by: scarlett22

Touchy touchy will not happen. Their scenes together have been devoid of intensity for months. Virat will look disgusted.. that's about it. Sai will be angry. And actually, I would be happy if their fights remain what they have been.

I'm disappointed that they have degraded Virat to such an extent and of course Sairat has been destroyed.

Sorry for my rant! I haven't watched Ghum in weeks and am going through withdrawal symptoms😆

Anyway in KD they had been married for a a few years right? So Ghum has that excuse ki they don't know each other's feelings.

That’s what … the later half of KD is about the tussle between husband and wife .. they both throw potshots at each other .. how will they do it here .. when they are so unsure about their marital status

Yeah but doesn't seem like Shruti is dying anytime soon...

Plus dna test proves baby isnt virats, not that virat didn't have an affair ... certainly it raises some suspicion on why he would have an affair with a pregnant woman who is having someone else's baby but its not impossible...virat is desperate to get validation from women he thinks are "bechaari" so if anyone, virat is capable of having an affair with a pregnant woman. And affair doesn't mean only physical right. Emotional involvement is also an affair.

What is infidelity legally- as far as i know it is a voluntary relationship established between an individual who is married and someone who is not the individual's married partner without the partner knowing. So what Virat has done to Sai fulfils that definition. He doesn't need to be proven to have had sex with the woman. If the circumstantial evidence suggests that he has acted in a manner where there has been a breach of trust...isnt that enough? And its not like virat claimed Shruti to be his sister or bhabhi. He has called Shruti HIS wife.

So dna test ya shruti ke mar jaane or even Sada ke vaapas aane seh it doesn't change the fact that virat is still guilty. Of sheltering a fugitive, falsifying information, of adultery. In the court of law he will have to be accountable for all these....

Technically bigamy ka charge shaayad nahi laga paayenge because he never registered his marriage with shruti....but baaki saare charges will apply right....

Forgot to tag you in previous post.

I'm genuinely curious....

As things stand- based on legal definition of adultery- isnt virat 100% guilty because he has voluntarily made a relationship with another woman despite being married without the knowledge of his spouse...it doesn't require him to be proven as having had sex with Shruti or proven as Sahas' biological father, right? The fact that he claimed and has his name on official records as husband to Shruti and father to random kid without knowledge of his wife- that certainly is not a small matter....

How will they justify it? Can virat tell the judge also- no, i said wait for sahi wakt?!

Why is he so obtuse about what he has done? Just not having a physical relationship doesn't mean a thing. The act of leaving his family, letting his wife go, what does it all imply ? I really hope the makers show him a mirror, but I known they won't.

Shruti is not dying in this serial. at least not out of medical complications (an intern treating her!)

If at all she has to die, she will because of an encounter. Probably cross firing, trying to save Virat or even Sai.

Then another dying declaration happens, a vaada..of taking care of Saahas...Virat Chavan ki pakki zabaan...Jai ho!

I dont know how that will salvage Sairat. The trust is lost. If every mission is gonna be like this, a new wife, a new child...

https://twitter.com/BinaRC77/status/1485102253388500992?s=20

Does this happen??

Infidelity clause is purely for physical infidelity. Unless the partner had undeniable proof of the other having intercourse outside their marriage or have proof of circumstances that point a reasonable person towards physical intercourse, it's not infidelity. So if someone wants to file divorce petition on the clause of infidelity, they should prove that the partner had sex outside the marriage, voluntarily, without thr consent of first wife

Bigamy is a peculiar little thing. Virat can say that no, I haven't registered her as my wife doesn't constitute a defense. Because registration of marriage isn't a necessaity make a valid marriage, but a valid marriage can be a registered marriage .

Saath phere are enough for Hindu marriage to exist. But you cannot actually say that since you haven't taken saath phere with 2nd person, you're not committing bigamy. The fact you called her a wife and treated her as one, causing loss to the consortium(rights arising from a Hindu Marriage) of your 1st wife is enough for bigamy.

Sai can go for infidelity and bigamy but a lawyer wouldn't because they're really complex to prove. Instead I'd go with cruelty. Cruelty isn't defined in Hindu Marriage Act, hence giving it both mental and physical meaning. Judges and lawyer look to the social background and whether the actions constituting cruelty cause any disruption in a normal healthy lifestyle of the wronged person.