What's wrong with current track. - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

12

Views

1.6k

Users

8

Likes

37

Frequent Posters

vimeo thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: ShipIsSailing

Yes, I agree with you. The reason why doctors recommend having a baby well below the age of 35 is because having baby at or after 35 increases the risk of several diseases such as Down Syndrome and various others. However, the optimum age for having children is from late 20s to early 30s, not between 20 and 23 (that's way too young lol). Because while the age plays a factor for the well being of the child while it is inside the mother, the mental and physical status of the parents needs to be well for the well being of the child after it has been born.

But, I absolutely loved the fact that you pointed something like this out, because this is a kind of awarenss which is very rarely seen in people. Many a times I have seen people saying that age is not a factor and they refuse to get married even after they are crossing 30s, and being quite vocal that they do want a family sometime in the future but are not ready now. They believe that all the talks about age and everything are only because of the mindset of society (it is true, but only partially) They don't think of the science behind it. I am quite passionate about this because somthing like this had happened in my family. So, it feels quite nice to see someone being aware of it.

Hey thnx for the response! I was pretty sure it wud be ignored bcoz its right now anti-Sai.

But yes its kind of an important subject and I agree with u. 20 is a bit too early is what I felt too bcoz a girl wudnt hv completed her education itself at this age. And we all know pursuing education after a baby is not everyone's cup of tea and is no joke. But I think in the video that I saw, the doc actually recommended something around this age group. This seems to be the science behind the legal age for marriage for a girl as well I think.

Shristhi2002 thumbnail
Sparkler Thumbnail 5th Anniversary Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#12

I still don't know how ITV get's baby within one ...ahemmm.😅😅😅

Kind of beizzati of .....meiosis and mitosis I guess in entire😆

I don't know what is on their mind now. 😆

I honestly can royally tolerate this baby convo, but my problem lies in their awesome badminton match going on.

Shristhi2002 thumbnail
Sparkler Thumbnail 5th Anniversary Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Yes, I have started agreeing to it. A lot of people say age doesn't matter, you should have babies when you want to. True but post 35, there are a lot of complications, and even for a mother, the recovery is slower. Seen so many examples around. Yes, the chances of Down's Syndrome increase with age. Yes, people should have babies when they want but then also should be able to bear and nurture the child come what age maybe

I agree with this actually.....😆

Seeing we are not immortal and natural cell aging and other issues. Not to mention fate.

And sometimes there are problems which go undetected for long but come out only when couples try for a child. Sometimes cancer and other issues as well....😶

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".