India got azaadi in BHEEKH- Kangna. - Page 4

Originally posted by: Zeal17

Krk and Kangana are cut from same cloth of the one always seeking attention. Kangana isn't the first Padma Shri awardee to make an irrational statement and isn't the last one to make one, there will always be attention seekers.

Question goes to those who despite knowing such people why they entertain them.. why keep track of them and why give them attention?

She got itta bada reward of ‘Padma Shree’ for being a bigot and brainless idiot from her masters but you have a problem when we give her a little bit of attention? Not fair!

Originally posted by: catchmeifucan

She got itta bada reward of ‘Padma Shree’ for being a bigot and brainless idiot from her masters but you have a problem when we give her a little bit of attention? Not fair!

arre sab log attention dete hain to those they don't like......people can discuss pages and pages about them...😆

Originally posted by: catchmeifucan

She got itta bada reward of ‘Padma Shree’ for being a bigot and brainless idiot from her masters but you have a problem when we give her a little bit of attention? Not fair!

Oh no no!!

No one is being unfair don't take it personal you can carry on with your insinuations.

The 'freedom in alms one ' is actually the least problematic comment she makes here

https://youtu.be/uy0dsIGbHNc

She dodges the question about Savarkar and starts rambling . Says the British allowed an Islamic Republic to be formed while leaving India ( Don't, even for a moment ,think she's upset about the violence during partition ) . Then she says secularism is no man's land. Implying people in a country have to fight for dominance along the lines of religion . She didn't like the idea of Muslims having a country of their own but she also wants Indians to get rid of secularism to make way for a Hindu Rashtra. The anchor doesn't question that contradiction because she's been peddling the same agenda through her 'news ' channel.

I have the opinion that India never fully gained independence. That we colonised ourselves after the British left. That's a long discussion anf I wouldn't want anybody to take this literally and accuse me of sedition . Even though we can't agree with the insensitive things she's actually trying to say here ,on principle we are going to have to support her 'right' to use the alms metaphor because filing charges against her for that and calling it sedition would be playing into the hands of people like her and her patrons who constantly harass those who criticise the ones in power, using sedition as an excuse.

Where sedition matters is when people who go after Aamir or Tapsee or Swara ( or any writer or activist who gets summoned) let Kangana get away with this. She should be called out on her double standards.

Originally posted by: Zeal17

Krk and Kangana are cut from same cloth of the one always seeking attention. Kangana isn't the first Padma Shri awardee to make an irrational statement and isn't the last one to make one, there will always be attention seekers.

Question goes to those who despite knowing such people why they entertain them.. why keep track of them and why give them attention?

Yeah makes you wonder why she was given the Padma Shri at all . What has her contribution to society been so far other than being a perpetual nuisance ? Why do some news channels keep inviting her even after she's said unacceptable things over and over ? Is it because these channels are funded by people who agree with her ? Who knows . I agree , she , and people like her ,should be ignored instead of being given awards.

Originally posted by: TrollikaDevi

Yeah makes you wonder why she was given the Padma Shri at all . What has her contribution to society been so far other than being a perpetual nuisance ? Why do some news channels keep inviting her even after she's said unacceptable things over and over ? Is it because these channels are funded by people who agree with her ? Who knows . I agree , she , and people like her ,should be ignored instead of being given awards.

Padma Shri isn't given for an individual contribution to society but for one's distinguished performance in their field of activity. Government opens a portal where people can nominate and self nominate for these Padma awards by sending their nominations(to be written in 800 words, I'm sure narcissistic Kanagana can manage that lol) and then there is a committee which approves. Finally approved by Prime minister and President of India. also not saying I'm living in world of illusions that there isn't a biasness involved who is selected from the one's nominated and approved.

Why Kangana called to news-entertaiment channels.. well for one simple reason TRP. There is audience which gives attention to such individuals

I don't need validation of my opinions from such people so I avoid Krk and Kangana and have been doing for long time.

🤣

https://twitter.com/ModiBharosa/status/1459031525899575298

Originally posted by: Zeal17

Padma Shri isn't given for an individual contribution to society but for one's distinguished performance in their field of activity. Government opens a portal where people can nominate and self nominate for these Padma awards by sending their nominations(to be written in 800 words, I'm sure narcissistic Kanagana can manage that lol) and then there is a committee which approves. Finally approved by Prime minister and President of India. also not saying I'm living in world of illusions that there isn't a biasness involved who is selected from the one's nominated and approved.

Why Kangana called to news-entertaiment channels.. well for one simple reason TRP. There is audience which gives attention to such individuals

I don't need validation of my opinions from such people so I avoid Krk and Kangana and have been doing for long time.

By contribution to society I was obviously not talking about charity work. I was saying that 'the distinguished ' part was questionable. I guess that's up for debate but these awards don't mean much if the previous awardees are anything to go by. When she gets put on a pedestal it would be hard for people ...by that I mean people like some of us on this forum to ignore the things she says ..because it's not just about her ,but about a larger mindset that allows people like her to get away with all kinds of things. Kangana is not the problem . People who are Kangana-Lite are the problem. Ones who dial it down and try to look rational on the outside but secretly agree with everything she says. Ten years ago she,'d have been booed out of public life or sent to a mental institution. Actually I think I get what she means when she says she's found freedom lately.

@ bold : Does it sell because that's what people want or do people end up wanting what they're being fed all day ? It's a chicken and egg situation.

Originally posted by: TrollikaDevi

By contribution to society I was obviously not talking about charity work. I was saying that 'the distinguished ' part was questionable. I guess that's up for debate but these awards don't mean much if the previous awardees are anything to go by. When she gets put on a pedestal it would be hard for people ...by that I mean people like some of us on this forum to ignore the things she says ..because it's not just about her ,but about a larger mindset that allows people like her to get away with all kinds of things. Kangana is not the problem . People who are Kangana-Lite are the problem. Ones who dial it down and try to look rational on the outside but secretly agree with everything she says. Ten years ago she,'d have been booed out of public life or sent to a mental institution. Actually I think I get what she means when she says she's found freedom lately.

@ bold : Does it sell because that's what people want or do people end up wanting what they're being fed all day ? It's a chicken and egg situation.

I disagree.. these awards means alot!! Ask those people who got those what it means for them. To those awarded in Art category especially Cinema doesn't define the entire Padma awards. When you say these doesn't mean much it's a huge disrespect to others who received for their hardwork.

I ignore what she says and stand by it because I know she is doing it for attention seeking. It's your assumption that anyone who is ignoring her is doing it because of agreeing with her in silence. So I'm not gonna contest that as I said earlier anyone here is free to live in their world or insinuations and I'm good with my conscious choice... Don't have to defend myself to you!

Originally posted by: Zeal17

I disagree.. these awards means alot!! Ask those people who got those what it means for them. To those awarded in Art category especially Cinema doesn't define the entire Padma awards. When you say these doesn't mean much it's a huge disrespect to others who received for their hardwork.

I ignore what she says and stand by it because I know she is doing it for attention seeking. It's your assumption that anyone who is ignoring her is doing it because of agreeing with her in silence. So I'm not gonna contest that as I said earlier anyone here is free to live in their world or insinuations and I'm good with my conscious choice... Don't have to defend myself to you!

I didn't say anything about you though?

It's not disrespectful to those who deserved it just because I said undeserving people have won them . Just like the Nobel. Some deserved it. Some didn't. It's okay to call it overrated and that doesn't take away from anybody's achievements in their field of expertise.