Sweden is a very interesting case. I think this Bloomberg article does a good job of explaining it.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-10-14/sweden-a-covid-success-story-or-a-failure-maybe-neither
One major, journalistic failure of the pandemic is definitely lots of numbers without context.
If 5 out of 10 people got sick and they live in a one-bedroom apartment, that's impressive that you were able to isolate five people. But if those 5 out of 10 people got sick and each person lives alone on an acre of land then it is a safety failure on behalf of many.
If 5 out of 10 people got sick and the system can care for only 1 sick person at a time it is a crisis. But if the system can care for 5 or more people at the same time it is not a big deal.
Unfortunately, a lot of COVID reporting has been a bit alarmist focused on big scary numbers or percentages, without contextual information like what was the total population, what is the population density, what is the healthcare infrastructure like. And now comparing transmission, hospitalization, and mortality rates to vaccination rates and vaccine statuses.
----
Risk tolerance is variable and the number one challenge we are facing is the conflict of what is perceived as a risk and risk tolerance.
For a certain percentage of the population
COVID Risk > Vaccine Risk
They have zero tolerance for the risk of COVID and want to implement every precaution possible to prevent COVID.
For another percentage of the population
Vaccine Side Effect Risk > COVID Risk
They have zero tolerance for the risk of taking a vaccine because of what it might do to their body.
For the most part, our perceived risks and risk tolerance don't conflict with each other. If you're afraid of dogs you don't get one and have leash laws and dog-free apartments and businesses to address your safety. Others can still own dogs with restrictions. But a highly virulent airborne virus affects the whole world drastically - and it is not easy to make choices.
For me, COVID risk is far higher than the Vaccine side effect risk. The data for me proves beyond reasonable doubt that I have to worry more about my loved ones getting COVID and dying of it than of any side effect we may get from vaccines. But that doesn't mean I lack complete empathy for people wary of vaccine risk. One of my colleagues has a family history of clotting and the decision was not as easy it was for me. There are fears and anxieties I have that I feel people don't get or empathize with at all. That is why I do want to give others the courtesy to at least provide empathy. I don't always do a good job. But I might not agree, and boy it would make me so much more at peace if everyone was excited about shots, and I'll try to convince folks - but ultimately I do get - people make choices - and you do you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNtTEibFvlQ
Edited by return_to_hades - 4 years ago