Originally posted by: vimeo
Let me ask you one simple question. Has Sai always been truthful to Virat? So why is it Sais pov is understood and not Virats? Virat needs to explain I agree. But thinking from his perspective he will not be able to be guilt free till Pakhi moves on. Though he loves Samrat he hasn't revealed the truth to him because he still hasn't realised that Pakhi is delusional. He wants to give Pakhi a chance to move on. He thinks like him even she can move on in life. If he reveals that Pakhi is still stuck in the past Samrat will not give a chance to Pakhi. Virat feels if Pakhi tries to understand Samrat she will surely be happy with him because Samrat is a much better guy than him. He really wants Pakhi to move on and he wants to give her a chance. He will realise how delusional and crooked ahe is only later.
About Sai and his relationship he knows Sai wont accept him and so he wants to move away. Which I think is the best for all right now because everyone's emotions are running high and no one is thinking rationally.
When the hidden truth is the reason for the roadblock between Virat and Sai, isnât it best to be shared?
I have always tried to understand the POV of both. If Sai had done the same, I would have said the same for her as well. I said this even when she hid the truth about Devi Pulkit marriage to him. If she acts dishonest in the relationship, she will have to face the consequences.
Similarly if Virat does, he also has to face the consequences.
I understand whatever you are saying about Virat thinking for Pakhi and Samrat. I have a different opinion on this too. I still feel that Virat should have disclosed the truth about Pakhi to Samrat or atleast should have said that whatever he said was his side of the truth and he can talk fo Pakhi and then decide.
How fair is it for him to even decide on behalf of his brother? Just for him to come out of his guilt or letâs say because he wants Pakhi to get a fair chance, he thinks it is okay for him fo hide the truth about Pakhi from Samrat? The lady has been trying to get close to him even after the cafe meet without one ounce of shame and he wants his brother to live his life with her without letting him know about her truth?
Letâs say he doesnât want to spoil a girlâs life, what about his brotherâs then? Didnât Virat share with Sai that he has someone else in his life and he has a commitment before getting married to Sai? Why did he do that? So that Sai is aware of what kind of relationship they are starting. Doesnât Samrat deserve to know the same? He has left it for Pakhi to share it to him then he can also share it with Sai at the same time assuming that Pakhi would have anyway let Samrat know her truth.
Sai accepting him and not accepting him also depends on how he acts too. If he continues to side with Pakhi, she will never be able to give him a benefit of doubt too. I too want her to think about what Virat has been telling her that it was all in the past. But that doesnât mean that Virat will continue to put down Sai ganging up with Pakhi and at the end cry that Sai doesnât understand him. Sai has to do certain things from her side and Virat also has to do certain things for Sai to feel assured of whatever he is claiming.
Just by views.
Edited by laksh - 4 years ago