Originally posted by: Shivi.forever
Agreed
Makers always give her heavy dialogues but when it comes to walking on that path she takes her step back.
Where as raghav s more of a person who does what he says. If he says i understand u he proves it by doing.
But she lacks there.
N lets not go to her double standards with d fam. Let's don't walk on d path which leads to quarrel đ¤đ¤đ¤đ¤
Exactly...
I don't know if it is the producer's fault , the directors, the writers or dialogue writers fault...but since last couple of tracks she is becoming more and more annoying...
In Mandar track which ideally was about her and her past..raghav insecurities, his fears, his anguish , were clearly visible, they were well defined and well conveyed and we, the audience were able to relate to him and understand his pain where as pallavi's misplaced farz and insaniyat rant , her apparent fear about loosing raghav which we never never felt till she herself said, were not visible, her perception , her thoughts were not clear and not brought on to screen..so no one could sympathise with her , infact she looked more insensitive to the most including me...
And now in this track...
Actually the audience should have hated Raghav being a grey charcter, stubborn , strong headed, making money through wrong means , completely opposite to the ITV MLs and should have loved Pallavi , the aadarsh, principled woman with values and ethics, she should have been the audience favourite but her moral science lectures, heavy dialogues, are getting on nerve , repelling her...
Even in this track , I am still are able to relate to raghav, understand his pov, there is this clarity of thoughts....his thought process , his mindset ,his reasons for what he is doing irrespective of being right or wrong are well defined and clear and it is coming out on the screen through his dialogues, through his actions, through his conversation, ...we know why he is doing, what he is doing, what he is upto etc etc ..
Where as pallavi though her intention are not wrong because , no one wants a husband who is involved in some wrong activities, her wanting him to change his ways of doing business might be right too but the way it is being put across is making her look egoistic and stubborn, I am still confused, whether she wants him to change, whether she wants his ways to change
On one hand she says she is trying to understand him, but from her dialogues and actions it looks like she has already decided that he is a criminal and he needs to change to become her ideal husband....it looks like she has taken up a challenge and she wants to win at any cost...where as it should have looked like she loves him so much that she wants a beautiful life with him which under this constant threat of police and unlawful activities is not possible...
she is coming out as bossy who just wants to control her husband because she is always right, she is perfect and flawless where as her husband is a bad person, with a facade of being good ,some one who has been putting up an act to be in her good books...
Sorry just my POV..