You guys... I had SUCH a hard time disagreeing with Raghav and Pallavi. I see both perspectives so clearly, and they're both right in terms of where their opinions are coming from.
At the end of the day, Raghav values money because he's experienced what it's like to have nothing. You can't just erase that association from someone's life.
Raghav's misstep is now that he thinks he needs to continue to do it - but his situation then and his situation now is different.
Pallavi although keeps saying she trying to understand his POV - actually needs to try (i.e. they need to show) to understand it. She clearly felt compassion for him bc she started to cry after his revelations - she clearly is heartbroken over it.
I'd say her misstep is just that she needs for him to come over to her side instead of really meeting him in the middle. Yet at the same time, her side isn't wrong! Who wants their spouse to continue to do illegal things? She's not asking him to change all of who he is. And maybe they need to have another heart to heart where she can specifically say - I just want you to stop doing illegal things. This is not about changing his business or taking it away from him, or taking his money away from him. It's making him realize, he's not in the same place as he was when he was 17. He need not make those same choices now.
But it's ITV, where would the drama be if they spoke that clearly.