Everyone has capability of falling in love multiple times. Love is a feeling, if you can hate a billions why can’t you love more than once? Monogamy is a choice not biology
🏏IPL 2026: SRH vs DC, 31st Match, at Hyderabad 🏏
🏏IPL 2026: GT vs MI, 30th Match, at Ahmedabad
GUILT ON CASE 20.4
PATH TO TRUTH 21.4
Celebrating Abhishek and Aishwarya’s anniversary
Internet goes crazy after Anne Hathaway says InshaAllah
TV Serials, From Must-See to Missable Episodes: Where The Magic lost??
Everyone has capability of falling in love multiple times. Love is a feeling, if you can hate a billions why can’t you love more than once? Monogamy is a choice not biology
Why it is so difficult to accept that virat pakhi fell in love with eachother. It was natural.they wanted to spend their life together.but destiny played its cruel game and now they are not together.Henxe virat feeling that one again he is loosing his love like last time is not wrong as per.
It's not compulsory that virat has to love only Sai.what important is he has moved on from his past .
Everyone has capability of falling in love multiple times. Love is a feeling, if you can hate a billions why can’t you love more than once? Monogamy is a choice not biology
Topic maker is questioning it because they call it "kuch nahi", "wakti fitoor" at times and love at times..They should clear the stance there.... Also Pakhi and Virat's relationship was hardly there for 10 hrs.. So calling it love is weird.
Originally posted by: asmi_joya
Topic maker is questioning it because they call it "kuch nahi", "wakti fitoor" at times and love at times..They should clear the stance there.... Also Pakhi and Virat's relationship was hardly there for 10 hrs.. So calling it love is weird.
They don’t remember last name of characters 🙌 Virat wanted to marry Pakhi whatever they had was pretty serious for them. He fell out of love with Pakhi because fell in love with Sai, there was no gap between these two to mark clear distinction and explain what feelings he had for Pakhi, would it have been same if Sai wasn’t there?
Originally posted by: asmi_joya
Topic maker is questioning it because they call it "kuch nahi", "wakti fitoor" at times and love at times..They should clear the stance there.... Also Pakhi and Virat's relationship was hardly there for 10 hrs.. So calling it love is weird.
Exactly. The dialogues are veering from one end of the spectrum to the other. He insisted...there was nothing to Pakhi in the cafe.
How is it past love if he said his relationship with Sai was of love! If anyone can, please go through that cafe conversation carefully. He was very clear.
Everyone has capability of falling in love multiple times. Love is a feeling, if you can hate a billions why can’t you love more than once? Monogamy is a choice not biology
Ofcourse love can happen multiple times. No problems with that. But why did Virat refute Pakhi at the cafe and call it nothing but momentary attraction. He could have very well called it as love if the intention of the writers is to show how Virat moves on from Pakhi and falls in love with Sai. This problem of showing one thing in an episode and reversing it 10 episodes later is what is irritating
Originally posted by: Soanz.19
Ofcourse love can happen multiple times. No problems with that. But why did Virat refute Pakhi at the cafe and call it nothing but momentary attraction. He could have very well called it as love if the intention of the writers is to show how Virat moves on from Pakhi and falls in love with Sai. This problem of showing one thing in an episode and reversing it 10 episodes later is what is irritating
The only opinion I have on this is that they don’t remember last name of their characters therefore I didn’t comment on Virat - Pakhi angle
They don’t remember last name of characters 🙌 Virat wanted to marry Pakhi whatever they had was pretty serious for them. He fell out of love with Pakhi because fell in love with Sai, there was no gap between these two to mark clear distinction and explain what feelings he had for Pakhi, would it have been same if Sai wasn’t there?
Wanting to marry and being in a relationship are two different things... People have different alliances in arrange marriage setups, they break before getting a proper destination...DOes not mean all can be called a full fledged marriage..
And regarding forgetting, this an important aspect of the show...They are not allowed to forget it , they have to make it very clear what it was and stick to that... I dont think anyone here things, people cant fall in love multiple times...The problem is writing here which is being pointed out.
Originally posted by: asmi_joya
Wanting to marry and being in a relationship are two different things... People have different alliances in arrange marriage setups, they break before getting a proper destination...DOes not mean all can be called a full fledged marriage..
And regarding forgetting, this an important aspect of the show...They are not allowed to forget it , they have to make it very clear what it was and stick to that... I dont think anyone here things, people cant fall in love multiple times...The problem is writing here which is being pointed out.
Today Sai statement-mne aajtak aapki sab bate Mani hai.this one line contradicts 300 episodes of this serial.After that there is no expectation of continuity from these cvs
The only opinion I have on this is that they don’t remember last name of their characters therefore I didn’t comment on Virat - Pakhi angle
It's getting difficult for many of the viewers to come to terms with the fact that such a crucial aspect which forms the base of the love story and progression of the lead couple is being forgotten. Honestly, this looks deliberate to me. I won't go into the reasons of it because I don't want this thread to be closed.