Lovely post!
Bold - this is the same question I have, especially after seeing the parallel drawn on Insta on Sai's story. It got me thinking, is Raghav treading on the same path as KR? I fear that the answer is yes. KR did not kill Raghav's dad and brother directly but his deeds left them to die at the hands of an angry mob. When Raghav's back story was revealed, we all hated KR and blamed him for Raghav's miseries and taking advantage of a young boy who was too naive to understand the implications of this trade.
Abhishek is older - probably 20?
The ACP pulled the trigger and killed this young boy. She should resign immediately or be put under suspension. Cops just cant go around killing people. It's police brutality. But what led to this mess? Raghav's ways. This has to be a wake up call. I'm not really bothered about evading customs duty, but the men employed, mostly young boys....that makes me think hard. Raghav was in a similar situation years ago. Of all people, he should know that young boys should not be part of this dirty game.
Raghav has always been a criminal and this was never hidden from us. He wasn't seen as a don for nothing. We saw his harsh ways from day one and we knew that there was a lot more than met the eye. The lion track and his clarification about what exactly he's involved in was again a subtle reminder that while he may not be into murder and extortion (or maybe he is but we don't know at this point), he's still involved in illegal activities. Even when the customs officer was angry with him after the temple incident, Farhad had told him to stop illegal activities because they'd earned enough money, more than Raghav could probably spend in his lifetime. His answer was that it was his junoon, and we know where that junoon comes from.
Because he fell in love and got involved in family drama, the risky side of his business was out of focus. Now that it's back in focus a lot of people are struggling to reconcile his shady side with his loverboy side. This is because of the way Raghav's redemption and his soppy side has been at the forefront for a while now.
When I think back to how I felt in the beginning of the show, I honestly never expected Raghav in love to be the way they showed him to be. I understand that when it comes to his loved ones, he shows this gentle side (except with Keerti, maybe) but his tough personality seemed to disappear on and off, which never sat well with me.
It's not the softness that's the problem but it's the complete change in attitude that people struggle to reconcile.
I am probably not using the right words to explain my thoughts. Raghav's too complex for me to describe at this point anyway.
The question I'll ask now is, in a bid to be different from Krishna Rao, is Raghav in fact becoming like him? Krishna Rao may not have directly wanted to get Raghav's family members killed but his actions and decisions eventually led to that outcome. I see some parallels with Abhishek's situation.As for Raghav's business being risky for young boys, yes he is responsible but only up to an extent. As an employer he doesn't get emotionally involved and this is the first time he's met one of these couriers in person, right? I know it's for the drama quotient and to set the stage for upcoming events. In the past, it was always through Harish or Farhad that these couriers were recruited, Raghav never met them and they never knew they were working for him. I personally find Abhishek being in the den, Raghav meeting him, etc. all very contrived just to move the story forward, but fine, whatever.
Unless Raghav was stealing from other dons, who would want to kill his couriers, he has never expected any of his couriers to die because of the smuggling. He has been evading the law and at most expected a jail sentence for them or himself. None of his couriers have ever been arrested, except Nikhil, and that too was his own doing.
Abhishek has been a greedy guy from day 1, he's the one who wanted Nikhil to ask Pallavi for a new phone, introduced Nikhil to shady people and he knew the risks involved. He didn't follow Raghav's orders and throwing the diamonds in DSE instead of on the highway, etc. was again all contrived just for Pallavi to find out. He shouldn't have run from the police even after being warned that he'd be shot.
The ACP is not above board and Raghav's challenge hurt her pride. There is no justification whatsoever for shooting Abhishek the way she did and where she did. Her seniors were right to reprimand her for it. She's bound to do more reckless things in the next 24 hours just to get back at Raghav. I understand she wants to bring him to heel. Even if she told him that she was keeping an eye on all jewelers, Raghav seems to be her primary target (probably after being tipped off by Sunny) and she won't stop at anything to get hold of him. Abhishek's death should get the ACP stripped of her job.
In terms of the actual death of Abhishek, it's all on the ACP. In terms of putting him on the ACP's radar, that's both on Abhishek and Raghav to an extent. This death should be a wake up call for Raghav that collateral damage is something he needs to care about from the get go and not when things happen. He may choose to continue smuggling, we don't know yet, but he might have to change his methods.