Police in ITV - Page 2

Originally posted by: MHRW99

Phone aa gaya upar se that she should not have shot unless proven guilty .. even then she cannot shoot .. they can arrest him or find ways to arrest him but shooting ??? she has to prove now he was running with the diamonds else she will be suspended from this case .. I think better suspend her 🤣

diamonds Pallavi ke pass hai .. May be inspector will go to pallavis and take it from her or Pallavi herslf will hand it over to the police

And Abhishek phone going to be checked .. last call is from Farhad .. they will get caught

Caught doing what?? Even if it is proved that Abhishek worked for Raghav, they didn't find any diamonds on him. They can't prove the smuggling.

I'm shocked how that lady shot him in the back without considering other options. She could shoot him in the arm or leg. Even that is not right coz she was chasing him on a tip. He wasn't a proved criminal or she didn't have orders to shoot at sight nor did he cross fire back at the police or the public.

I want her to be suspended even if later it is proved he was smuggling, doesn't justify her killing someone on a hunch.

Originally posted by: joliefemme

Caught doing what?? Even if it is proved that Abhishek worked for Raghav, they didn't find any diamonds on him. They can't prove the smuggling.

I'm shocked how that lady shot him in the back without considering other options. She could shoot him in the arm or leg. Even that is not right coz she was chasing him on a tip. He wasn't a proved criminal or she didn't have orders to shoot at sight nor did he cross fire back at the police or the public.

I want her to be suspended even if later it is proved he was smuggling, doesn't justify her killing someone on a hunch.

If they track Farhad them they will know Farhad works for Raghav and they will connect the dots .. may be diamonds Pallavi will hand over to the police ..

and yes even after that she cannot shoot Abhishek .. she should be suspended .. that’s what I mentioned too

I was mentioning about the orders they have got from higher authorities that if they don’t prove that he had diamonds she would be suspended .. not my words

My words are even if they find the diamonds she can’t shoot … she should be suspended

Originally posted by: MHRW99

If they track Farhad them they will know Farhad works for Raghav and they will connect the dots .. may be diamonds Pallavi will hand over to the police ..

and yes even after that she cannot shoot Abhishek .. she should be suspended .. that’s what I mentioned too

I was mentioning about the orders they have got from higher authorities that if they don’t prove that he had diamonds she would be suspended .. not my words

My words are even if they find the diamonds she can’t shoot … she should be suspended

I don't think Pallavi will hand over the diamonds to the police. Raghav at the end of the track will pay off the duty with back penalties. The ACP should be thrown off the case because whatever the situation doesn't justify her shooting Abhishek.

Originally posted by: joliefemme

I don't think Pallavi will hand over the diamonds to the police. Raghav at the end of the track will pay off the duty with back penalties. The ACP should be thrown off the case because whatever the situation doesn't justify her shooting Abhishek.

I agree she should be suspended .. she has no rights to do an encounter like this and that too in a busy market place .. anybody could have got hurt .. actually I was expecting that somebody else will get hurt .. but it was Abhishek

Inspector was totally irresponsible but here they are not looking for logic .. they are basically building up for Raghavs guilt

Originally posted by: MHRW99

I agree she should be suspended .. she has no rights to do an encounter like this and that too in a busy market place .. anybody could have got hurt .. actually I was expecting that somebody else will get hurt .. but it was Abhishek

Inspector was totally irresponsible but here they are not looking for logic .. they are basically building up for Raghavs guilt

U know it's possible this happened, it doesn't seem too far fetched.

This lady seemed too overconfident from the get go so she worked on her bunch which was totally wrong. She may have not anticipated the guy will die. They need to show her side otherwise it seems too illogical.

I think she shot him hastily. In that entire mess, maybe she wanted to shoot him in the leg but ended up shooting him in the back.

Originally posted by: joliefemme

U know it's possible this happened, it doesn't seem too far fetched.

This lady seemed too overconfident from the get go so she worked on her bunch which was totally wrong. She may have not anticipated the guy will die. They need to show her side otherwise it seems too illogical.

Yes but I have no expectations from itv

Originally posted by: AnushkhaA

I think she shot him hastily. In that entire mess, maybe she wanted to shoot him in the leg but ended up shooting him in the back.

So all the more she should be suspended .. she can’t be so impulsive in this profession .. and take somebodies life just because she has the gun ..

Originally posted by: AnushkhaA

I think she shot him hastily. In that entire mess, maybe she wanted to shoot him in the leg but ended up shooting him in the back.

They are trained to have a proper aim. Leg and back are so far from each other.

Actually considering the chaos in the market, she should have not fired coz it was risky for the public.

ACP special officer does know the differences b/w chest and leg what officer yar ???🤪

Also shooting in public is not allowed .

What to expect it is ITV , any thing can happen 🤣

But after that the shot of pallu running and hugging raghav pleased my heart so regards .....