I am a silent reader in this forum and was waiting for a topic like this to put forth my two centsâŠ
The writer & the producer claim that they wanted to show the dilemma of Pallavi choosing between her Duty(Mandar) and Love (Raghav)âŠbut my question to them is Where was/is the dilemma at the first place????? whatever they have shown till now of Pallavi in this trackâŠshe is very clear about what she wants and what she wants to doâŠshe clearly chose Raghav as her husband over Mandar, she firmly chose to help Mandar over her responsibilities as a wife, she chose Babaâs promise over Raghavâs insecurities, she chose to believe her instincts over Raghavâs warnings on Mandar and above all she chose to stay at Deshmukhs for whatever time it takes than staying with her HusbandâŠ.she clearly chose to help Mandar over everything. All of these were conscious decisions without an iota of pondering or confusionâŠ.so I want to ask the writer sir, where was the dilemma that they are talking aboutâŠ
If they really wanted to show Pallaviâs conflict then the writers completely failed in it⊠because neither there was a C of conflict nor D of dilemma in her decisions or actions⊠and to make it worse she was doing all this while being fully aware of Raghavâs intense love for her, his insecurities and Mandarâs intent to reclaim her as his wifeâŠ
Had they NOT shown the love confession & her zillion promises then we could have given Pallavi the benefit of doubt that she was not aware of Raghavâs love for her because everything Raghav did to her till that point could have been easily categorized as redemption care concerns attraction or even affection but NOT LoveâŠbut after confession she knew to what extent he loved her so no excuse there. Similarly had they shown Mandar as a nice guy or at least fake it in front of Raghav & Pallavi. Had they NOT made it Raghav vs Mandar from the word go, Had they NOT revealed Mandarâs intent and the extent to which he went to have Pallavi back, at least not in front of her then again we could have given a pass to her behavior on the grounds that she has nothing to doubt about him and is trying to help a nice person. So her very act of ignoring Raghavâs love and choosing to believe Mandar despite knowing Mandarâs intent, her character came across as completely loose and shallow if not a cheatâŠ.You canât hurt your husband, be insensitive towards his feelings, ignore his insecurities to help your Ex and call it humanity. I donât even understand how can the writer come up with something like this without realizing the damage they are causingâŠ
Itâs really unfortunate that they thought they will show a wife consciously and deliberately choose her possessive Ex over her loving husband for whatsoever reasons and the viewers will accept it.. coz the very thought is revolting as per ITV standardsâŠ.
Pallavi is very kind human who can put herself into trouble to help anotherâŠthatâs her basic character but the writerâs here failed to come up with a solid reason to justify her insensitive behavior towards Raghav and ignorance towards Mandarâs IntentâŠ
The damage is doneâŠwithout a logical intense redemption track for pallaviâŠthey may not be able to install back viewerâs love & trust to the characterâŠ
This track had so much potential to make the show more interesting and as well as character development but the writing completely failed the plot as well as the characters.
Edited by Anu1975 - 4 years ago