Deleted - Page 3

Originally posted by: Priya516

My think was , if your husband outside your door and is so emotional and he is pouring his heart out , wouldn’t you at least acknowledge that and let him know she is right there . I would be screaming so badly if my husband is pouring his heart out and door is closed.. I would scream or bang on the door from the other side to let him know that I am there and be apologetic and pacify him. But Pallavi was just standing there and let Raghav do all the talking without any reactions .. she was arguing with VD instead her focus should have been Raghav.

She thought that she would be able to convince her baba and meet him . But when she realized aisa nahi ho raha and raghav is getting restless she rushed upwards so that she could talk through the window.

Her not shouting was again for unnecessary drama and angst .

Originally posted by: ...EhSaas...

As demanded by fans she should draw a line

Yes she did draw a line but sadly she choose wrong side of line to stay which is not only costing her but her love one too

Pallavi dialogue writer is worst and I think same dialogue writer who was there during pregnancy track

Bina haath pair ka sab kuch aur pata nahi kaunse zamane ka hain woh 😆

Savage dude😆

Han humne usse lines Mandar ko bahar rakhne ke liye draw karne boli amd she drew a line which kept her inside it only😆

Originally posted by: Jiarao

I don't think that's the case. The track is going in right direction and Pallavi was always about words not actions. Her dialogues were preachy before too and she was called out again and again for that. It's her character. She is like that. Nothing wrong about that.

That ghar par koi nahi tha was a slip up I think. Inconsistencies were always part of this show.

Then the point is proved no. Isn't it bad if your fl is all words,.no actions. Being preachy is different. She's shown to be a hypocrite and someone who can't live up to their words. Why so shallow sketch. She wasn't so earlier, what changed now.

Chalo we'll ignore the ghar pe koi nahi tha point because at tense moments, when you are being interrogated, it's human to end up exaggerating story to justify mistakes.

Originally posted by: Phoenix_Fire123

Poor writing , dumb plot , forced execution , kachra dialogues to FL .

I really think we should forget what happened in last 2 weeks and start afresh like sikku.

Blame it on the producers and writers not on pallavi mode on 😎

Bhool toh jaun par kaise ?? They need to give me something better to forget this kachra no ?

I forgot the forced marriage track bcz the track dt followed had me glued to the screen.

Need something amazing to get over the raita that this track has spread.

Originally posted by: DaffodilsNew

Den I guess she is a fan of RR too😆

Jokes apart Sai never uses exact words written for RR. He improvises whenever possible and I think the way he delivers them is what makes it more real.

Originally posted by: jakkula.sirisha

Sare ghar ke log mandy ke bed ke paas nautanky kar rahe hai

Jaise uska haath jali nahi balki uski nas cut gayi

are suna ni tumne boli to wo..uska pura hath jal gya ta wo bed se uth b ni pa ra ta.. logically and scientifically dono statements ka koi connection ni h … pr its ok hr koi science stream se padha ho jaruri ni… Pallavi arts stream se padhi hogi.. waise b common sense is not so common or uske case me to bilkul b ni.. I think ye Raghav b bol chuka h use..

I wonder if the writers meant to show Pallavi lying? Or was it an honest mistake in her dialogue?

I mean from an audience perspective Pallavi lied to Raghav. There were several people in the house when that Mandrama occurred. Pallavi volunteered to go bring the doctor. So she lied to Raghav. Audience won’t forget it even if Sandiip does. I’m no purist but it makes sense to tie up loose ends and close them in a story- you cannot forget threads you opened up in a story and tell the audience to forget them.

Originally posted by: Jiarao

Dimag bhool 🤣

Still "Ghar par koi nahi tha" was much better than Pallavi is Raghav's inspiration🤪

I think the day is near when Star plus will say to viewers MHRW bhool bhool...😆

[

Yeah! I would have kicked every damn door there was to get to him. And every idiot in my way.

Originally posted by: Phoenix_Fire123

She thought that she would be able to convince her baba and meet him . But when she realized aisa nahi ho raha and raghav is getting restless she rushed upwards so that she could talk through the window.

Her not shouting was again for unnecessary drama and angst .

Originally posted by: IAMHope

You are right but let’s not forget she is a 24 year old , widowed, un widowed orphan girl trying to make sense of everything that’s going on in her world.

Yes, she drew these lines around her and chose where she wanted to be and now her choices are closing in on her and strangling her.

But she can learn from it. She can learn that she is not infallible and it’s ok to make a mistake. You can be good, kind, selfless and WRONG at the same time. She can learn that she was played and that because of her compassion and goodness she could be in situations where she may get played again and learn to protect herself.

She can learn that trust goes both ways. If placing a tracker was breakdown of trust then not believing her husband even after he told her of the 7 day challenge and when he said he saw Mandar is also a breakdown of trust.
She can learn that she must draw boundaries that protect herself, her marriage and her current husband.
With these new learnings we can progress Pallavi’s character and move on to unravel other parts of the story.

You are right abt all things but Pallavi isnt an orphan. She has a loving brother and SIL. They dont show them often but whatever we hv seen of her brother......le loves her and is very protective of her too. Dts also another thing I find very odd. She gave D family a even higher position dn her brother who has basically brought her up singlehandedly. Anyone would consider dt brother as one's everything. Bad writing.

Definitely she can learn and grow but will she ? Dts the most daunting question . Whatver VD did today.....she should hv realised dt moment itself dt the man cares not even a bit abt her and is downright selfish. This isnt the first incident. As I hv said before.......people learn by making mistakes......better words are log girke sambhalte hain. But how many times does Pallavi need to fall ? Mandar.......dt I understand but VD.....dt man has treated her so badly time and again and yet she denies to see him for what he really is.

I hope they make Pallavi's character progress from here like you said and not make her go back to being dis gullible again.

Originally posted by: IAMHope

I wonder if the writers meant to show Pallavi lying? Or was it an honest mistake in her dialogue?

I mean from an audience perspective Pallavi lied to Raghav. There were several people in the house when that Mandrama occurred. Pallavi volunteered to go bring the doctor. So she lied to Raghav. Audience won’t forget it even if Sandiip does. I’m no purist but it makes sense to tie up loose ends and close them in a story- you cannot forget threads you opened up in a story and tell the audience to forget them.

Mandrama🤣🤣🤣

I think it was an honest mistake. She meant der was noone else who could hv helped ......bcz she behaves like she is the only one to the rescue everytime. Didnt exactly lie. Its a way of saying it I guess.