Importance of saying 'No' - Page 6

Originally posted by: lateuser1234

https://tenor.com/view/seinfeld-jason-alexander-george-costanza-slap-fight-jerry-seinfeld-gif-4735568

https://tenor.com/view/jon-stewart-eat-eating-popcorn-watching-gif-5102037

This has literally turned into a battleground😆

Originally posted by: DaffodilsNew

This has literally turned into a battleground😆

Right. See when producer has said everything is his vision nd its right. and let the dog bark then y waste energy. Let him show wt he want. I dont see point now in these discussion.

Originally posted by: fria319

This is what I've been saying all this week - she needs to learn to fight for her own rights, desires, self worth. She was able to do it with Raghav, idk why she goes mum in front of Mandar. All she's been able to say is Raghav is my husband. She hasn't even said I love Raghav, he is my husband to D fam/ Mandar.

Regardless of that though, I don't think she'll actually wear the bangles. That bedroom convo with Raghav really opened her eyes. She's going to do her best to make sure he doesn't feel insecure like that ever again. That much she's made clear not by just her words, but her actions these past 2ish episodes.

I think Mandar bluffed, he may have bought the bangles, but she may not have worn them, just accepted them in order to appease his mental fragility. OR, he forcefully put them on under the pretense of maybe buying bangles for his mom, etc., something dumb like that.

My main question is how/why Pallavi went anywhere with Mandar alone. She knows her husband is uncomfortable with Mandar, why does she put herself in these situations, idk. We'll have to wait and see how this goes down. Maybe she wasn't alone on the shopping trip itself, but just at the bangle store or something.

@ Bold : This is wht I mean too. She seems to be very quiet when it comes to Mandar. She cant even say she wants to stay wid Raghav .

See I dont hv issues wid bangles. You can hv a thousand reasons for it. I hv no expectations from Mandar. He seems manipulative . But I hv expectations from Pallavi to speak up.

I will wait for tomorrow's episode before saying anything further ( Honestly the way this post went.....I might not write again in the forum again) but Raghav isnt the kind of person who would just believe Mandar's words. Must hv seen something.

As for why Pallavi went wid Mandar.....dts obvious no....why does she go to him everytym.......family pressure , Sulo's planning , emotional blackmailing by Madar or Doc's advice. One of this will be the reason. Khud se toh wo jaegi nai.

Originally posted by: lateuser1234

Right. See when producer has said everything is his vision nd its right. and let the dog bark then y waste energy. Let him show wt he want. I dont see point now in these discussion.

Yes understood.

This will be my last post as well.I mean I will answer to the replies. But dts abt it.

Didnt forsee this to getting this bad.

Originally posted by: DaffodilsNew

Yes understood.

This will be my last post as well.I mean I will answer to the replies. But dts abt it.

Didnt forsee this to getting this bad.

Ppl r passionate to d fault. Good decision.

Originally posted by: RainbowUnicorm

We have yet not seen tomorrows episode so too soon to bash Pallavi about bangles. We dont even know what they will show .

Second, how is it okay if Raghav can get insecure or manipulated by Mandar, but its not okay for Pallavi to get manipulated?

Lastly, Pallavi thinks of Mandar not as a ex husband but as a memory loss patient , who is trying to regain his balance and as Aai Baba's son. So she is genuinely being considerate of his situation on humanitarian grounds. She is under 3 pronged attack from Kaku, Mandar and Doc Amma..and she yet doesnt know Mandar is challenging Raghav. Remember she came and asked today to Raghav if all is fine. Raghav chooses to not tell her.

Again I repeat, at this point she is a pawn between Raghav and Mandar. Raghav did an investigation on Raja/ Mandar...he didnt disclose the findings to Pallavi. He didnt let her know of Mandar challenging him.

Both Raghvi have to understand the power that Mandar holds here and work together.

Why is she helping him heal is like asking ...if you saw a accident victim on the road, a man, will we not stop to help him irrespective of how much we love or respect our husband? Why because its humanitarian.

First thing.....I AM NOT BASHING PALLAVI. I am really not. Bangles are not a big deal to me ......its her not speaking up dt bothers me. Its anyone who is uncomfortable in a situation and doesnt speak up .......dt bothers me.

Second point.....yes okay I give dt to you. If Raghav can get manipulated so can Pallavi. But then I never said Raghav was ryt either. Did I ?

About your point.....chalo all agreed but dts not what my post is about . My post is specific and generalised to all people who find it difficult to say No.

Lastly I am doctor myself. I know all about helping and caring for people you dont even know and who wont even remember you later. We all get emotional but that doesnt mean I dont draw a line where required. And No I never asked why Pallavi is helping Mandar. Never asked dt. I understand her obligations but I dont understand why she doesnt let her discomfort in certain situations be more audible.

Originally posted by: lateuser1234

Right. See when producer has said everything is his vision nd its right. and let the dog bark then y waste energy. Let him show wt he want. I dont see point now in these discussion.

Exactly

if he wants to show his show in a certain way , let him to it. It is he who is investing his money and resources in the show. We all watch the show for merely 22 minutes in a day but they have to work for 2 days for 1 episode I think. If we are not liking then remote is in our hand. We can change the channel in a second

He indirectly stated that if you are liking the show continue watching it and enjoy and if not leave it. And I don't find anything wrong in his approach

The show was his creation. Either he will elevate it or destroy .It should be only his decision

Originally posted by: Sunaina7

Exactly

if he wants to show his show in a certain way , let him to it. It is he who is investing his money and resources in the show. We all watch the show for merely 22 minutes in a day but they have to work for 2 days for 1 episode I think. If we are not liking then remote is in our hand. We can change the channel in a second

He indirectly stated that if you are liking the show continue watching it and enjoy and if not leave it. And I don't find anything wrong in his approach

The show was his creation. Either he will elevate it or destroy .It should be only his decision

Absolutely.

See his money. He will choose how to burn it. I get that ppl have invested so much time and promoted his show that is y dey also feel ownership to it. Normal human tendency.

And no he didn't minced any words. He clearly said dogs keeps on barking which clearly shows wt he thinks. Its fine. He is dt confident in his vision so let him be.

What I find interesting here is psychology of different groups. All this suggested an idea of social experiment to me. It can be a very good social experiment but too lazy to create a thread for it. So won't be making dt.

Originally posted by: Sunaina7

Exactly

if he wants to show his show in a certain way , let him to it. It is he who is investing his money and resources in the show. We all watch the show for merely 22 minutes in a day but they have to work for 2 days for 1 episode I think. If we are not liking then remote is in our hand. We can change the channel in a second

He indirectly stated that if you are liking the show continue watching it and enjoy and if not leave it. And I don't find anything wrong in his approach

The show was his creation. Either he will elevate it or destroy .It should be only his decision

This is his old habit

During yhm too he said if you don't want to watch show then use remote. He also got bashed because of his over confident and used to give lollipop scene of leads to make fans happy and otherside present all stupid things

At that time they had TRP in their hand which is not case here

And need to understand there is difference between bashing and constructive criticism because he overboard many time in his show

Originally posted by: lateuser1234

Absolutely.

See his money. He will choose how to burn it. I get that ppl have invested so much time and promoted his show that is y dey also feel ownership to it. Normal human tendency.

And no he didn't minced any words. He clearly said dogs keeps on barking which clearly shows wt he thinks. Its fine. He is dt confident in his vision so let him be.

What I find interesting here is psychology of different groups. All this suggested an idea of social experiment to me. It can be a very good social experiment but too lazy to create a thread for it. So won't be making dt.

@bold- That's the truth

I will like to add a line to it. He didn't go to the public himself to promote the show. He made a promo and a concept with his money and gave to star plus. The audience got attracted to it.He didn't seek charity from the audience to forcefully like his show. They themselves got invested. Even when he does promotions with like of YouTube channels or newspaper he has to shell out his own money. All the onus of the show is on him. Audience should be a little restraint in their demand(personal opinion)