Knowing and Understanding are two different words with two different meanings.
- In one of previous episodes Pallavi said that her life won't be enough to understand Raghav.
- In Saturday's episode she said that she knows Raghav better than he knows himself.
- In today's episode, she said that she dont know if she can ever understand Raghav.
The purpose of this post is to discuss something as I saw many comments about what Pallavi said on Saturday and to correct myself about a comment I made.
After Saturday's episode I posted a comment somewhere that she said she knows Raghav better than he knows himself when she had already decided that her life won't be enough to understand him. After today's episode I realized that both of them are two different things.
Knowing a person and understanding a person are different, it is connected though. ❤️
You can't understand a person without knowing them but you can know a person without understanding them. Understanding always comes after knowing. Knowing is an easy task but understanding is not.
So when Pallavi said that she knows Raghav, she did mean that she knows how he will act and react to certain situations and when she said that she don't understand him, she meant that she didn't know why he acts and reacts the particular way he do.
So whats you all think about this?
Wasn't Pallavi right the both times? She do know him but she don't understand him. 💔
@RosyRosh: Rosh, I'm tagging you because I saw your comment about this, that you didn't like what Pallavi said about knowing him better than himself and even I replied that I didn't like it too. 😆
