Who is (are) the real victim (s) in ghum? | DT Note P.6 - Page 5

I checked the video

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CPVlwpKhxEh/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CPVollwhX-q/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet

1 Aishwarya said "If you think from Pakhi's POV she is the main victim"

2 She didn’t call Sai Badtameez

3 She thanked fans for appreciation and success of the show and asked everyone in general to not spread negativity, she didn't target Sairat fans as you have claimed

4 Interviewer asked her specifically about Sairat fans that's when she took the name of the fandom

I don't want to defend her but she already gets so much hate, why do this? You didn't even share the video of the interview, I can see why but it's not nice

Originally posted by: NoraSM

I checked the video

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CPVlwpKhxEh/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CPVollwhX-q/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet

1 Aishwarya said "If you think from Pakhi's POV she is the main victim"

2 She didn’t call Sai Badtameez

3 She thanked fans for appreciation and success of the show and asked everyone in general to not spread negativity, she didn't target Sairat fans spread negativity

4 Interviewer asked her specifically about Sairat fans that's when she took the name of the fandom

I don't want to defend her but she already gets so much hate, why do this? You didn't even share the video of the interview, I can see why but it's not nice

I didn’t watch the iv and I don’t even want to, according to those who watched whatever points I’ve put forward have been confirmed by them.

I wanted to reply to this point. I think victims depend on the context. A victim can equally act as an oppressor in different situation. For me, Sai is a Victim for a no of a reasons

1. Pakhi abuses her because she thinks Sai is snatching Virat away from her. Sai is an innocent party there. If Pakhi thinks Virat broke her promise then she should have taken the frustration and anger out on him. Pakhi has no right to abuse Sai. I have no issues with Pakhi harbouring feelings for Virat. She cant be blamed for her feelings. But the problem is when she chooses to trouble and abuse Sai. She has no right to do so. Its not Sai's fault that Pakhi and Virat shared a past. They should have settled it amongst themselves than inflicting troubles on Sai.

2. Kaku abuses Sai because she is not her choice and she opposes Kaku's power. Sai is a threat to Kaku's domination. She sees an opponent in Sai. Hence she tries to disregard and pins down sai. She even tried to stop Sai's education, she purposefully hurts her in the kitchen etc.. Even here Sai is becoming a victim for no fault of hers.

3. Ninad, Sonali, Omi taking out their anger too on Sai because Kaku dislikes her. They constantly drag her down with their talks. It's not Sai's fault that she isn't their choice of bride. So for these reasons, I think Sai is a victim but at the same times, she is a fighter. She fights her own battles. I will call her a survior. Its not her actions that are causing her abuse from these people. She had no other choice

Pakhi was treated unfairly with the deal, Chalo for a sake of it I will accept their stupid Vada. But her present state is because of her actions. She cahsed away Samrta. Both her and Virat robbed him of his agency. They acted immaturely. Except for the Vada crap, her state is a result of her actions. I pity her but the min she abuses Sai all my sympathy goes out. Also, she has options- return to Maika and start afresh. She has supported her parents too. She is digging her own grave.

Samrat was treated unfairly too. He didn't deserve any of this. But I wouldn't call him a victim per se. he too had options. He was wrung badly by Virat and Pakhi though

Virat- I sympathize with Virat a lot- a toxic family, orthodox upbringing, unlucky in first love etc. But he is not a victim. He did suffer but I won't compare his sufferings with Sai. He was a victim of his own actions. He had no right to decide for Samrat. Though my boy had only good intentions.*sobbing*. But he was immature and stupid. His lack of communication and non-confrontational nature costed him

Actors are mostly protective about their roles. I don't mind their viewpoints but they shouldn't defend toxic traits. Also, viewers have their own undersatnding. This is what I feel

Originally posted by: idkwhattoput

perfectly articulated!

I don't consider anyone as victim. All are facing the consequences of their own decision. Either all are victim of their own circumstances or they're none! No one can be more "victim" or less "victim"

DT NOTE

You are free to discuss about an IV that an actor has given but kindly watch/read that interview before posting your thoughts. Otherwise this leads to bashing an actor based on what others thought or understood.

And also share the link of the IV next time.

Moral policing isn’t allowed as per rules. So don’t say what someone is entitled to say or not.

If someone violates a rule, use the report button and let DT handle the issue.

Regards

GHKPM DT