Definition: “Consent occurs when one person voluntarily agrees to the proposal or desires of another.” -Wikipedia
Virat never agreed to Pakhi’s proposals or desires. In fact, he clearly refused her advances. He did not give consent to any physical or non-physical advances. So yes, Pakhi is harassing him. This is not care or concern; this is harassment.
Care and concern are only applicable when it is welcome by the recipient. Virat never welcomed Pakhi’s so-called care and concern, no matter how genuine the actors may think Pakhi’s character is.
Even in medicine, if a patient refuses to be touched by a healthcare professional, then they may not be touched. If the doctor/nurse/therapist does touch the patient without their permission (regardless of their intentions), they can be charged with assault and battery. I don’t know about India, but this definitely applies in the litigious societies of US/Canada.
I recently took a class in first aid/CPR, and the first thing we were taught is that if the patient is responsive but refuses care, then legally no one can touch them. This even applies to kids. If a child does not want to be hugged, kissed, or if they even do not want to shake hands, they cannot be touched without their permission. Everyone has a right to bodily autonomy. So it is not intentions, but impact that matters.
Why is this so hard to understand for grown adults?
P.S. I merely stated what was on my mind. This is not a comprehensive lesson on consent (obviously). Please add anything you may wish to.