Final decision is yours but that logic is extremely flawed. You are basically encouraging bowlers to get tied on this and asking people to predict considering that bowlers will get tied.
Makes no sense to me. You can either break the tie using economy rates or just award 4 points to anyone who named even one of the tied bowlers.
there is another issue with this. according to this i gave half correct answer. What if i predicted 2 other right apart from this? Would i get bonus of 2 correct or 3 correct? If 2 correct then basically you are neglecting this half correct and giving even 2 points doesn't make sense. If i get bonus of 3 correct then giving me 2 instead of 4 doesn't make sense.
If i remember someone else also raised an objection on this tied calculation last game.
Make a decision regarding this and add in rules. Or don't accept incomplete one name entries like i sent.
Its been just 3 games and it wont be tough to calculate scores again in the tied column because there is no consistency in logic of this tied marking :)
Thanks :)
33