Living room = Ladai ka adda - Page 3

Originally posted by: Chandu_500

love story progression is good. but my problem is with this pakhi didi and the importance that is given to her character and mainly her expressions 🤢

How much importance given to Pakhi's character in other two versions? Were there a lot of confrontation scenes between Sai and Pakhi? Why Virat still hasn't clear misunderstanding between him and Sai? Sai still thinks Virat has feeling for Pakhi.

Originally posted by: Chandu_500

love story progression is good. but my problem is with this pakhi didi and the importance that is given to her character and mainly her expressions 🤢

Yup,scenes and execution. Cuz instead of clearing Viru from his so called love,they everytime show as if he is again thrown back in a loop when he is with Pakhi.

And we audience see it as irritation as "Why does he need to clarify her" of his personal situation.

And unnecessary defence towards her actions.

As in today precap,they show Pakhi promising that she will stop the wedding at any cost. What is the defence for her action now? Oh,she respects elders ,Sai is wrong ,kaku is with devi tai.

Hellllooo,we watch the show too didi.

And the reaction to didi's actions by Viru or Sai are so out of the place and unexpected by audience,that Sairat get at loggerheads. And the characters of Virat and Sai get victimised by us. Didi ki toh sirf "beizzati" hoti hai.

Originally posted by: luvdesitelly

How much importance given to Pakhi's character in other two versions? Were there a lot of confrontation scenes between Sai and Pakhi? Why Virat still hasn't clear misunderstanding between him and Sai? Sai still thinks Virat has feeling for Pakhi.

Virat doesn't hold anything for didi now. He has cleared that,but unfortunately he has cleared it to wrong person.

And he shares right things with wrong person at wrong timing.

Originally posted by: luvdesitelly

How much importance given to Pakhi's character in other two versions? Were there a lot of confrontation scenes between Sai and Pakhi? Why Virat still hasn't clear misunderstanding between him and Sai? Sai still thinks Virat has feeling for Pakhi.

importance as in, as she is the parallel lead in she was given a good amount of screen space. but importance to that character in virat's life was naa ke barabar..as he always ignored her. in fact in tamil version vikram used to talk to satya(pakhi) rudely sometimes. neither rano nor vikram was this 'sweet' with pakhi.

satya in tamil version was a complete villain, she tried to kill sharanya and was shown as a complete negative character.

roopkhota was also evil but she had some class and self-respect.

pakhi ko tho kuch aur hi bana diya hai..🤪

yess sai and pakhi ke kaafi scenes the inboth versions.

in tamil version vikram openly expressed his feelings through his cations and dialogues after the separation track. and so is rano..yeha virat ka pata nay kya hoga.

Originally posted by: Shristhi2002

Yup,scenes and execution. Cuz instead of clearing Viru from his so called love,they everytime show as if he is again thrown back in a loop when he is with Pakhi.

And we audience see it as irritation as "Why does he need to clarify her" of his personal situation.

And unnecessary defence towards her actions.

As in today precap,they show Pakhi promising that she will stop the wedding at any cost. What is the defence for her action now? Oh,she respects elders ,Sai is wrong ,kaku is with devi tai.

Hellllooo,we watch the show too didi.

And the reaction to didi's actions by Viru or Sai are so out of the place and unexpected by audience,that Sairat get at loggerheads. And the characters of Virat and Sai get victimised by us. Didi ki toh sirf "beizzati" hoti hai.

It seems creatives failed to properly develop character of Pakhi and Virat. Still don't understand what the hell is Pakhi doing in Chavan Niwas? She has no husband in Niwas. Better off go back to her Mayka and get annulment. What does she think that someday Virat will have change of heart and then she can marry him? What a sick mentality. Virat is also live in his la la land. Both characters seem out of place at times.

Originally posted by: Chandu_500

importance as in, as she is the parallel lead in she was given a good amount of screen space. but importance to that character in virat's life was naa ke barabar..as he always ignored her. in fact in tamil version vikram used to talk to satya(pakhi) rudely sometimes. neither rano nor vikram was this 'sweet' with pakhi.

satya in tamil version was a complete villain, she tried to kill sharanya and was shown as a complete negative character.

roopkhota was also evil but she had some class and self-respect.

pakhi ko tho kuch aur hi bana diya hai..🤪

yess sai and pakhi ke kaafi scenes the inboth versions.

in tamil version vikram openly expressed his feelings through his cations and dialogues after the separation track. and so is rano..yeha virat ka pata nay kya hoga.

Creatives should turn her into complete villan. In hindi version, there is no proper development of her character.

Originally posted by: luvdesitelly

It seems creatives failed to properly develop character of Pakhi and Virat. Still don't understand what the hell is Pakhi doing in Chavan Niwas? She has no husband in Niwas. Better off go back to her Mayka and get annulment. What does she think that someday Virat will have change of heart and then she can marry him? What a sick mentality. Virat is also live in his la la land. Both characters seem out of place at times.

And you know ,sorry if I seem biased over here.

But Virat appears different with Pakhi or scenes which involve discussing Pakhi,as you have said above he appears in lala land. As if he is trying to do damage control for the other. A first impression falls in such scenes.

But if it only Sai ,then it appears different,Virat stands out and even we can connect and try to understand his intentions. He looks emotional.

And Pakhi has no motive here. Only degrade Sai as we see,but the character defence spoils it.