Sleet of Emotional Quivers on RadhaKrishn Love CC#10/DT Nt Pg#41 - Page 50

Ok just a thought could they end with Radha Krishna and start with a reincarnation angle. Like in Buddha Avatar, Rukmini could become Yashodhra.

Radha could there be Sujata someone who fed kheer to Buddha at a time he was nearly finished and way too weak. You know a story of unexpressed love (as it is according to them Radha Krishna have Sakha Sakhi waala love)

They could get back Dhritrashtra and Duryodhan as Bimbisar and Ajatshatru.

Balram could be Mahaveer(they could make VB do something more than useless comedy)

Yashoda n Devaki could be the two mothers.

Only I don't like Samb as my Rahul

What say shall we give this idea to CVs over Twitter 😉😉

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Ok just a thought could they end with Radha Krishna and start with a reincarnation angle. Like in Buddha Avatar, Rukmini could become Yashodhra.

Radha could there be Sujata someone who fed kheer to Buddha at a time he was nearly finished and way too weak. You know a story of unexpressed love (as it is according to them Radha Krishna have Sakha Sakhi waala love)

They could get back Dhritrashtra and Duryodhan as Bimbisar and Ajatshatru.

Balram could be Mahaveer(they could make VB do something more than useless comedy)

Yashoda n Devaki could be the two mothers.

Only I don't like Samb as my Rahul

What say shall we give this idea to CVs over Twitter 😉😉

Excellent.

Pradyumna can be Rahul.

If this shows up on TV, we know who to blame.😆

Originally posted by: vyapti

I was remembering you Sakhi. You have come here almost after 6 months I think. How r u?

I believe that they only mentioned those characters that were significant to the story. Now these were political stories . Only those women who themselves were active in politics or whose marriage was politically significant or whose descendants were politically significant are mentioned.

Missed you sakhi 🤗 kaisi hain aap ?

Yes you are right Sakhi. They cleverly constructed those storylines to fit a certain narrative. May be Dhritarashtra didn't have 100 sons and 1 daughter but these numbers create a certain impact you see and probably Jayadratha was the only significant son in law so they didn't feel the need to mention his other daughters(if there were) . Similar theories can be applied to others. There is always a 50-50 probability regarding the gender of a baby. Having 5/7/10/15.....sons in a chronological order isn't impossible, but every other woman having sons in a perfect sync sounds too good to be true. 🤔

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Ok just a thought could they end with Radha Krishna and start with a reincarnation angle. Like in Buddha Avatar, Rukmini could become Yashodhra.

Radha could there be Sujata someone who fed kheer to Buddha at a time he was nearly finished and way too weak. You know a story of unexpressed love (as it is according to them Radha Krishna have Sakha Sakhi waala love)

They could get back Dhritrashtra and Duryodhan as Bimbisar and Ajatshatru.

Balram could be Mahaveer(they could make VB do something more than useless comedy)

Yashoda n Devaki could be the two mothers.

Only I don't like Samb as my Rahul

What say shall we give this idea to CVs over Twitter 😉😉

🤣🤣🤣

Nothing is impossible for these crackheads though. I would suggest you to be prepared to sue them with plagiarism and demand your fair share of profit if they ever decide to bring your imagination to fruition. 😆

Btw, was Buddha really the 9th incarnation of Lord Vishnu ?? Wasn't Balraam the 8th and Krishna, 9th ? But then Krishna is often referred as the 8th. It's all so confusing. 🤪

Of all the characters in Mahabharata, Krishna's life's documentation is the most messed up imo. You are almost always left scratching your head in utter confusion. My man Krish had too much in his plate ! 🤪 Imagine all those wives,all those children !!!

This Krishna though is prudent and vivacious enough in his 120s to play holi with his all time sakhi,part time premika on the streets of Dwarika 😲 how thoughtful ! Imagine being the head of a powerful state,then participating in a bloodbath, losing a huge chunk of your near and dear ones, losing almost all of your army(Kauravas lost, so i guess vrishni sena too were killed almost to extinction),all that pain,all that irreversible damage,all those orphaned children and mourning subjects and all you can think of is ROMANCE ??? 🤢 If i were in the shoes of samb in this version of the story,hell i would be mad af too ! 😡 Your father running after his gf while your mother and his other legally married wives watch all these with bizzare nonchalance can sure disturb a nerve or two in me let alone Samb. 😵 These cvs and their nibbi fandoms couldn't get anymore absurd than this man !!! This is the pinnacle of ignorance and moral illiteracy. I was sad to see this horrible show winning several awards,talk about the credibility of award shows ! 🤢 At this point,we can safely assume,they don't care as long as they are squeezing out whatever amount of profit they can by exploiting stupid nibbis' obsession with Loveria. 🤬

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Ok just a thought could they end with Radha Krishna and start with a reincarnation angle. Like in Buddha Avatar, Rukmini could become Yashodhra.

Radha could there be Sujata someone who fed kheer to Buddha at a time he was nearly finished and way too weak. You know a story of unexpressed love (as it is according to them Radha Krishna have Sakha Sakhi waala love)

They could get back Dhritrashtra and Duryodhan as Bimbisar and Ajatshatru.

Balram could be Mahaveer(they could make VB do something more than useless comedy)

Yashoda n Devaki could be the two mothers.

Only I don't like Samb as my Rahul

What say shall we give this idea to CVs over Twitter 😉😉

No. Seeing Buddha and Sujata dancing together with dandiyas would be too much for me.

Originally posted by: Krishnpriya

Missed you sakhi 🤗 kaisi hain aap ?

Yes you are right Sakhi. They cleverly constructed those storylines to fit a certain narrative. May be Dhritarashtra didn't have 100 sons and 1 daughter but these numbers create a certain impact you see and probably Jayadratha was the only significant son in law so they didn't feel the need to mention his other daughters(if there were) . Similar theories can be applied to others. There is always a 50-50 probability regarding the gender of a baby. Having 5/7/10/15.....sons in a chronological order isn't impossible, but every other woman having sons in a perfect sync sounds too good to be true. 🤔

I am fine sakhi. ❤️

You are right. Just that...I did not mean that they cleverly constructed those storylines...at least at first. I meant that the characters that are not relevant to the storyline are not mentioned/named. Like most of the ITV shows have very few male characters because they are not relevant to the storyline.

This being a political story women were usually not relevant. Even now if we write a historical novel we do not mention most of the female characters.

Perhaps at first that was the case. Then over time we forgot the existence of the female characters

Originally posted by: Krishnpriya

Nothing is impossible for these crackheads though. I would suggest you to be prepared to sue them with plagiarism and demand your fair share of profit if they ever decide to bring your imagination to fruition.

Btw, was Buddha really the 9th incarnation of Lord Vishnu ?? Wasn't Balraam the 8th and Krishna, 9th ? But then Krishna is often referred as the 8th. It's all so confusing.

I think

In some scriptures Balram is considered as an incarnation of Sheshnag and Krishna is considered as 8th incarnation of Vishnu.

In some scriptures (e.g. SB) Balram is considered as 8th incarnation of Vishnu and Krishna is considered as Purnavatara (so he is outside 10 incarnations).

So Buddha is 9th Avtar in both the cases.

Originally posted by: Krishnpriya

Btw, was Buddha really the 9th incarnation of Lord Vishnu ?? Wasn't Balraam the 8th and Krishna, 9th ? But then Krishna is often referred as the 8th. It's all so confusing. 🤪

Some people say Buddha was one of the incarnations of Vishnu and some say Balram was. I have heard it's because they think Buddha was different from all the other avatars. He was against all those hindu rituals and practices that he thought were regressive and wrong and a new religion came to be formed called Buddhism hence lot of Hindus don't want to accept him as one of the avatars. Balram is always said to be the Sheshnaag avatar.