Originally posted by: arsneh
it is personal matter of Eijaz agree but it can be his call to discuss or not only till he don't bring it in show and in viewers platter to discuss it
is so difficult to understand? time and again I have mentioned here if u r bringing urs personal issues in show (whatever is the reason) u r subjecting it to be discussed and judged be it rubina's divorce thing Eijaz's childhood trauma or his history that includes vikas or aly jas relationship or Rahul's proposal to disha all of them brought these stuffs by themselves with their choice and provided them in platter to be discussed and judged now control and choice of discussing doesn't rests in owner's hands only but viewers and HMS hands as well
so when Eijaz discussed vikas thing it was just a doubt he had he wanted to clarify with vikas but didn't after that thing aired most of us almost thought that vikas must be having some hand in his past case? abhinav explained it right that u not blaming vikas did anything but u put a question mark that did vikas have his hans in this?
toh doubts on vikas character in viewers mind erupt
rahul was making him understand that only and siding vikas he was making a logical stand so does aly abhinav and arshi none can be blamed he is or anyone else can very much interfere in that talk coz after Eijaz brought it up on NTv it's not at all only his call to discuss other can question him as well.
regarding rahul butting in and rivalry thing he said in LF well its ur perspective u seeing it in my perspective he was taking the stand for vikas whose character was wrongly assassinated due to Eijaz doubtful comment and I don't think he did any wrong in taking that stand regarding he have nothing own his own well u need to see full LF the whole discussion was about him getting advantage and sending to jail only vikas Eijaz discussion erupted during his discussion so Rahul ko dusro se mudde nikalne ki zaroorat nae uske khudke mudde sufficient hai