Okay,watched the episode and having a little headache
Now,in sanam-archana issue
What sanam might want to say was invalid,but maybe she dint find a relevant tamil word and said "Poi",But sanam had an option of using english there and could've called out archana saying its irrevelant to the case,so why speak of it
But appreciate sanam for speaking in tamil so everyone understands and but if you want to address any issue,do it in a language you're comfortable else it will lead to misunderstanding
Archana points were not valid in respect to the topic and it dint support suresh's accusation either,So why bring it in 1st place
Dragging that issue to dinning area was not right,it was part of task should have left it then and there
Even in dinning most dint understand what sanam wanted to say,but most of them were with archana in explanation part,this is where groupism shows even if they claim it isnt
And they come to know severity of matter when someone runs off crying!Even if its overdramatic,it dint sit well with me
Balaji saying sanam a liar,why nobody corrected him?
I think i can understand why "Poi" word hurt her,that word has been used for her even before entering BB
only after balaji said you are lying she went berserk and ran out,helplessly with none to defend her and others realised and went after her
Now,when arguement was on why none asked others to understand what sanam was trying to say?But were asking sanam to understand what archana was trying to say!