🏏IPL 2026: RR vs RCB, 16th Match, BCS, Guwahati🏏
🏏IPL 2026: PBKS vs SRH, 17th Match, New Chandigarh🏏
🏏IPL 2026: CSK vs DC, 18th Match, MACS, Chennai🏏
ABHEERA IN DANGER 10.4
Vishal Bharadwaj Under Fire On Post Against Dhurandhar
Vridang spin-off separted from Kyunki main.
Deepika Padukone Paid Less For Raaka
No China Mentioned In New Maatrubhumi Version
ModernAstro is Live — Try Your Free Kundli + 30-Day Pro Access
Originally posted by: zaroonkashaf
I think it's just weird. He gave an interview to one of the channels out there and talked about how Sushant was talking to him about some project a day earlier I think. Then you get to learn he was in touch with Rhea prior to Sushant's passing and even in July. If I'm not wrong he was Sushant's talent manager. I think one is just trying to piece things together here. Because it then makes you wonder how many of these people who gave interviews to media channels were getting their "versions" from Rhea. As in they were probably hearing her side of things. I doubt any of these people actually talked to his family. So no matter how diplomatic or candid these interviews were, the fact that some of them were in touch already with Rhea does raise a few eyebrows.
👍🏼Ah right! Makes sense. Thanks for putting this forward.
I believe Sara is not involved. Didn't rhea mentioned sara name in Aajtak interview? Then samuel started talking about sara along smita😕
Rhea left out Sara's name na? She told it was all boys Thailand trip. But people found out that sara also went with him and Rhea was lying. Are you talking about some other interview?
Some guest on Arnabs debate said they have booked the reporters under the same non-bailable section that is put on Rhea..... making it clear to be a vendetta against the republic reporters and also to hide whatever they are hiding...
He said the police are scared they will destroy evidences hence that section which doesn't make sense..,..wonder what evidences they will destroy
Cricket
Anupamaa
