Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan
Ranbir has done 17 movies out of which only 6 are clean proper hits. 35% hit rate. Hardly anything to be happy about. 
Also Bombay Velvet was the biggest disaster ever. No film has seen that kind of rejection. 
Question is about if we have better actors than Ranbir, not if we have more successful actors? Even in his flop movies like Tamasha and Rocket Singh, one cant deny his acting is natural. Someone like Sri Devi also had many flops but it's the acting and impact one leaves, that counts. Lamhe is seen as an iconic movie today whereas back then it was not regarded a hit. Same is happening with movies like Tamasha and Rocket Singh. Plus, his flops movies like Roy (where he wasnt even a lead) and Besharam ave 10cr openings so it's not his acting thay sucks, it's the script and that can happen to any good actor including a Sushant or a Rajkumar.
If I judge from the panel of actors we have today, Ranbir outshines them all. Even without the Kapoor name, he would have made it. There is a reason almost every single actress wants to work with Ranbir, because he is a fine actor of the current gen. From Alia to Disha to Tara to Shradhha to Tripti D. 
Edited by Silveraliax - 5 years ago
 
 
8