Originally posted by: Sabhayata
 Yup KJO is definitely the soft target here. KJO is a public figure more than other producers like Adi Chopra , SLB etc. He hosts a very famous and scandalous show + many events, As a face he is perhaps the most well known producer and if Dharma is a brand today major reason is KJO. So all this makes him more susceptible to hate. I truly don't mind the hate because he is public figure such people need to get used to extreme praises and extreme hatred. Issue is this hatred is seeming quite hypocritical to me now. On one hand ppeople can't stop writing hate messages on the other hand they still want him to continue making movies, continue investing his money only not take his favs like Alia or Jhanvi but take others.😆.Matlan kuch samajh nahin aaya.
Also audience is very easily shifting all the blame from themselves to KJO. As if by hating him audience will redeem themselves. Its the audience who made star kids movie a hit and Sushant's movies flops. Now its very easy to put all the blame on KJO and Alia and forget the role they played themselves.
People blindly believed the rumours about Sushant just like people are now blindly believing rumours about KJO boycotting Sushant or publishing blinds about him etc. There is nothing to disprove or prove any of these claims. But in both cases people blindly believed both the rumors so what they did with Sushant then they are now doing with KJO. So where is the difference.
KJo is soft target because he has openly admitted to certain things such as, getting projects for Alia, making snarky comments about the looks of certain outsiders to dissuade producers, being the gossip center along with couple of Kapoors and so on. 
There are a lot of others who also probably do what he does . For example , Tapsee was replaced by Ananya in a film despite reaching an agreement with the makers that she will be cast in it. 
But KJo is a soft target because, well, it isn't like as if he has been discreet or apologetic about what he does.
How are the audience preferences or which film they make a hit related to things like inserting yourself into projects as a producer to push your mentee into them and chuck out whoever has already been signed? How does someone from the audience consuming a blind item justify systemic targeting of someone's character during the peak of Me Too movement? 
So the burden of accountability should completely bypass the actual people within the industry and fall on the audience?! 
I do want one thing to happen though (which is wishful thinking on my part,) - for Masand and the writers of all the other blinds insinuating that he is a pervert - to be questioned by the police. Would love to see them actually come out with who paid them. 
Finally - the likes of Soni Razdan are trying hard to center this about just Sushant's depression to deflect attention from their daughter and her mentor. Others from the insider clique are doing this - making it just about the traditional definition of nepotism so that they prove that they are not clique-y because - "Hey look , I gave an opportunity to X outsider , so I'm not an elitist prick" . 
Literally no one from the filmi families have addressed the culture of malicious whisper campaign btw. The silence has been deafening. It hasn't just happened with Sushant . It has happened with even Kartik , RKR and others too, though to a lesser degree. 
These topics and issues within the industry may have gained traction as something to be discussed and introspected on due to Sushant's demise. But these will still be valid and exist even if one can never prove or know for sure if any of them acted as a final trigger or factor. 
Edited by lunza - 5 years ago
13