Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 5 - Page 24

Rohit- sorry bol draupadi ko bhabhi hai teri didi hai teri🤣omg i could not stop laughing at all🤣

Originally posted by: Andy3456

But if he had been Vidur's son, he would be automatically incapable of sitting in the Throne as Vidur himself was shudra.

Niyog son of Vidur, legally he was the son of Pandu.

Aside why else do you think Kunti would have come up with that divine birth Theory

Originally posted by: Andy3456

But if he had been Vidur's son, he would be automatically incapable of sitting in the Throne as Vidur himself was shudra.

Niyog dads are not actually dads. Legally, Yudhishtira was Pandu's son and heir.

Vyasa does say it to Yudhishtira after war, so we know Vidura was the biological father.

Also Vidura was not shudra. Vidura was kshtta, an even lower caste as Vyasa was low caste. I get darned irritated at peeps who claim Karna was low caste. No, he wasn't! The author was low caste. Yudhishtira was the biological son of an actual lower caste man.

16. From a Sudra spring in the inverse order (by females of the higher castes) three base-born (sons, apasada), an Ayogava, a Kshattri, and a Kandala, the lowest of men;

https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/manu/manu10.htm

The dasi who bore Vidura was a kshatriya, not a shudra. Vyasa was shudra. therefore, Vidura was kshatta.

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

I guess ancient times were far more liberal than today. Pandu suggesting and Kunti/Madri agreeing to be with other men to bear heirs for him is a huge thing.

Not a huge thing. Niyog was an acceptable and very common practice those days..

The people who died earlier or who couldn't have kids needed someone to be their heir, obviously this was the best way for it

Happy Guru Purnima🙏🏼

A big hug to all our Gurus🤗

Originally posted by: Mages

yeah he say sorry many many times arpit is too cute and innocent🤣❤and rohit is a prankster🤣

arpit saurav nirbhay rohit shaheer vin lavanya aham praneet they still contact each other even after 7 years thick friendship🤗thats why everyone mention a show they can never forget in their lives as it gives them lifelong friendships and atmosphere that brought back to their college lives❤such moments in lives comes once in a lifetime and touches the soul❤

than we have shaheer-srj-pooja trio❤️this friendship is too pure how srj spread warmth and love to pooja-shaheer when they meet❤

Why didn't Yudhishtir himself say sorry though?

Even the BRC people are still friends after 30 years of the show. Kauravas+ Pandavas together supported Gajendra sir during FTI issue. I guess Mahabharata makes you friends

Originally posted by: Mages

Happy Guru Purnima🙏🏼

A big hug to all our Gurus🤗

Happy Guru Purnima

Guru kaun hai yahan

Originally posted by: Mages

Rohit- sorry bol draupadi ko bhabhi hai teri didi hai teri🤣omg i could not stop laughing at all🤣

🤣🤣

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Niyog dads are not actually dads. Legally, Yudhishtira was Pandu's son and heir.

Vyasa does say it to Yudhishtira after war, so we know Vidura was the biological father.

Also Vidura was not shudra. Vidura was kshtta, an even lower caste as Vyasa was low caste. I get darned irritated at peeps who claim Karna was low caste. No, he wasn't! The author was low caste. Yudhishtira was the biological son of an actual lower caste man.

16. From a Sudra spring in the inverse order (by females of the higher castes) three base-born (sons, apasada), an Ayogava, a Kshattri, and a Kandala, the lowest of men;

https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/manu/manu10.htm

The dasi who bore Vidura was a kshatriya, not a shudra. Vyasa was shudra. therefore, Vidura was kshatta.

How was Vyasa a Shudra? Being the son of Parashar Muni?

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

How was Vyasa a Shudra? Being the son of Parashar Muni?

Satyavati as adopted daughter of fisherman chief was Nishada