Originally posted by: grumpydwarf
Your missing the point. Performance are subjective. If it was good other quality film makers would have noticed it. Lol he couldn’t find one good script.
Point is a quality filmmaker like the maker of Dangal offering Sushant good work when he could have worked with any overhyped star kid shows he must have saw talent in him.
I am not missing the point, awards are given based on performance, not on promise.
What happened post Raanjhanaa is irrelevant. Best Debut Award was given for his performance in Raanjhanaa, anything else is you just trying to win an internet debate.
10