Indeed but it's not her greed for money imo. It's her greed in wanting what her contemporaries have.
Hadn't left for Hollywood and released Chaappak earlier, then it might have work.
🏏IPL 2026: Rajasthan Royals vs Mumbai Indians,13th Match, Guwahati 🏏
🏏IPL 2026: Delhi Capitals vs Gujarat Titans, 14th Match, Delhi🏏
MEHERs GAME 7.4
Aditya dhar would have paid Virat to promote Dhurandhar 2 - Kohli Fans
Cocktail 2 turns bitter. Shahid kapoor upset over lack of screen time.
ARYAN ki SHADI 8.3
Nitesh Tiwari reveals Yash in Ramayana won’t be a traditional villain
Anupamaa 07 Apr 2026 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Raaka - AA22 Title Reveal - Allu Arjun
Celebs At Jamnagar - SRK Salman Ranveer
Ameesha Patel Vs Zakir Khan
Why No one is talking about this??
Indeed but it's not her greed for money imo. It's her greed in wanting what her contemporaries have.
Hadn't left for Hollywood and released Chaappak earlier, then it might have work.
Its a combination of things but not greed ...those 10cr for Padmavat and profit-sharing is what's going to enable her to produce more movies, so business-wise it's good thinking
for me it's her collaboration with Sanjay Leela Bhansali over the years is what hurt her career and her PR team
....yes working with Sanjay Leela Bhansali gave her fame, financial and box office success but showed her and presented her as a limited actress...the fact that in Padmavati and Mastani her performance is viewed as the weakest says it all ...don't know what happens but I honestly don't believe that a director's job is to dictate an actor's performance....maybe give them few points if they are new but not dictate or influence
...a director as I believe should take as much takes as possible and choose the best shoot afterward and organically the actor performance will change with each take.....some might disagree and there are for sure different ways to direct but I feel that's the best along with having good pre-production work and screenplay readings with the actors before the actual shoot
....but what Sanjay did in those movies is that he dictated Depaka performance which ended up making her look dead and stiff on screen
This is the custom in the film industry, to demand more during high time because you never know if your next up coming movies will work good or not.
It's a common thing in the film industry.
Chapak didn't lose because of her greed for money. People rejected her movie because she supported some JNU (fake) activists. Instead of making it as a PR stunt and supporting her country actually (which barely these stars do) it would have made enough for her job.
Deepika and Sabyasachi- Global leadership summit https://x.com/cnbctv18news/status/1984526822336577540?s=46 t=gmo_g396jwmtO4eUOAuljw
These are a time I liked these two. But sadly Hrithik is a dried up flop actor like Aishwarya Rai. He hasn't been able to have a hit in years!...
I am sure all of you work a full-time job. I took a high-paying controller with a Japanese manufacturing company in California and am...
I feel she deserves much better career because she is tall, fit, smart, attractive, beautiful, talented, pretty, well-behaved, glamorous and...
Deepika Padukone addresses silent treatment on Dhurandhar here is the video https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWOLBLwPAKQ/ [NOCOPY]
11