Question to those who are claiming - Page 4

This year makers have crossed all boundaries of Biasness

Or maybe it could be that Asim and Rashami went on a rant about BB being biased and making comments on cameraman and the people working behind the show and that's why they are being shown less now? Ever thought of that?

If I sit here and insult majority of the forum members, you think the members are going to react kindly to me or my topics going forward?

Originally posted by: Unsila

Show 50 minutes of Rashmi and asim alone. And show will be flopped within a week 👎🏼

You are Delusional if u think ppl only like sidnaz. Just because you are a fan of certain someone ,you can't completely deny others involvement in trp. It was sid vs rashmi and sid vs asim and paras vs asim which made the this season successful so in order to prove your point, you can't question others' existence and contribution to the show. No one has said them to show only rashmi and asim but atleast be fair in providing all with equal screentime. Every story matters ,be it frndship ,love or hatred.

Originally posted by: Rahm

Or maybe it could be that Asim and Rashami went on a rant about BB being biased and making comments on cameraman and the people working behind the show and that's why they are being shown less now? Ever thought of that?

If I sit here and insult majority of the forum members, you think the members are going to react kindly to me or my topics going forward?

Ppl of that stature who have majored in this industry are expected to show some respect towards their work if not to any contestant. They should behave maturely instead of taking it to heart. Afterall,they've not said anything that's not true. Even big celebrities are pointing it out. The example that you gave is absolutely irrelevant. A more plausible example would be that if we say that our teacher or lecturer is biased, then is that teacher rightful if she cuts our marks deliberately or fails us in practicals/theory. A person is always expected to respect his job and not misuse it for their personal agenda or hatred or ego for that matter. The editors' and makers' job is to entertain audience,respect their choice , make the show interesting and tell stories from which the audience also benefits. Promoting violence ,vulgar language and cheap romance in the name of frndship is only making our society more regressive.

Originally posted by: lifeiscool

Ppl of that stature who have majored in this industry are expected to show some respect towards their work if not to any contestant. They should behave maturely instead of taking it to heart. Afterall,they've not said anything that's not true. Even big celebrities are pointing it out. The example that you gave is absolutely irrelevant. A more plausible example would be that if we say that our teacher or lecturer is biased, then is that teacher rightful if she cuts our marks deliberately or fails us in practicals/theory. A person is always expected to respect his job and not misuse it for their personal agenda or hatred or ego for that matter. The editors' and makers' job is to entertain audience,respect their choice , make the show interesting and tell stories from which the audience also benefits. Promoting violence ,vulgar language and cheap romance in the name of frndship is only making our society more regressive.

Of course people are expected to behave properly. But people are human and they have feelings and flaws too. Perhaps the editors don't find Asim entertaining? Did you think of that? Also people that work behind the scenes work a lot and don't take lightly to being told they're acting a certain way. I can understand if he called out the editors but he called out cameramen and Rashami called out the head of the channel indirectly.

Just because people are expected to behave a certain way doesn't mean they will. I think if someone trashes the show or the makers, they are within their right to cut the person. It's THEIR show. They call the shots.

Edit to add: what you might find entertaining and what someone else might find entertaining is going to be different. Regardless of what they have been doing with their show, TRPs have remained good for them so to them people are liking what they're showing. Why would they care about some little outrage when overall the show is number one and constantly being talked about?

Originally posted by: Rahm

Of course people are expected to behave properly. But people are human and they have feelings and flaws too. Perhaps the editors don't find Asim entertaining? Did you think of that? Also people that work behind the scenes work a lot and don't take lightly to being told they're acting a certain way. I can understand if he called out the editors but he called out cameramen and Rashami called out the head of the channel indirectly.

Just because people are expected to behave a certain way doesn't mean they will. I think if someone trashes the show or the makers, they are within their right to cut the person. It's THEIR show. They call the shots.

Edit to add: what you might find entertaining and what someone else might find entertaining is going to be different. Regardless of what they have been doing with their show, TRPs have remained good for them so to them people are liking what they're showing. Why would they care about some little outrage when overall the show is number one and constantly being talked about?

So you agree that if you called your teacher or professor biased,then they have the right to fail you in an important exam.

Originally posted by: Rahm

Of course people are expected to behave properly. But people are human and they have feelings and flaws too. Perhaps the editors don't find Asim entertaining? Did you think of that? Also people that work behind the scenes work a lot and don't take lightly to being told they're acting a certain way. I can understand if he called out the editors but he called out cameramen and Rashami called out the head of the channel indirectly.

Just because people are expected to behave a certain way doesn't mean they will. I think if someone trashes the show or the makers, they are within their right to cut the person. It's THEIR show. They call the shots.

Edit to add: what you might find entertaining and what someone else might find entertaining is going to be different. Regardless of what they have been doing with their show, TRPs have remained good for them so to them people are liking what they're showing. Why would they care about some little outrage when overall the show is number one and constantly being talked about?

Trp was coming when sid and paras were in secret room. So shouldn't asim also get the credit and shouldn't you agree that the show can do wonders in sid or paras's absence too.

Originally posted by: lifeiscool

Trp was coming when sid and paras were in secret room. So shouldn't he also get the credit and shouldn't you agree that the show can do wonders in sid or paras's absence too.

Did they share or not? Is it there in unseen videos?

And what about BB's fake audience voting for Asim? and now he has won elite task also.

From my perspective its difficult to judge the level of impartiality based upon singular events, you need to look at the precedence and standards set by the creators themselves and see if there is some level of inequality between contestants.

Some of the examples which come to mind are firstly the acceptance of abuse of family members, this is something which was widely ignored in the show and no member was called out for such filthy language. This than escalated and majority of the male members started using such language however it was Asim who was called out individually for using such language when clearly based upon the season so far it was widely accepted that such language is acceptable.

Secondly Sana's behavior has been pretty erratic throughout the season, in comparison to some of the previous weeks I would say this week she seemed more stable. However when a standard has been set that whatever Sana does is going to be widely accepted than you cannot criticize her if it doesn't sit well with the direction you want the show to go in. You cannot promote a set behavior but at the same time harshly be critical of the same theatrics it just doesnt work both ways.

We also have many examples of weekends being used to selectively expose certain members discussions yet others are given a clean slate & finally there seems to be a grey area around which matters are personal and which are not. Rashmi's personal matter is brought out by the host which it clearly shouldnt be, however as both members have been paid handsomely and volunteered to be there I guess its fair play. However on the flip side when matters got enraged between Vishal and Madhurima it was deemed to be personal therefore the show creators didnt want to get involved, Vishal was also criticized by the host for flagging this(The same host who brought up another members personal matter).

In conclusion the show may not be blatantly biased towards anyone but the standards and regulations are clearly lopsided which as a result favor some over others.