Deepika shows up at JNU to support students protesting against govt - Page 38

https://twitter.com/iAnkurSingh/status/1214643764976701440

https://twitter.com/SwamiGeetika/status/1214745698278596609

Originally posted by: ZanduBaaM

https://twitter.com/SwamiGeetika/status/1214745698278596609

Exactly, i feel there is more than what meets the eye in this jnu protest scenario.... Some vested party is manipulating the students and using them to further it's own cause......

Claims that abvp people were carrying acid exactly when Deepika was gonna visit.... Not blaming Deepika entirely but someone is being a mastermind here.... To disrupt the country, to spread hatred, discontent and malign the present government badly.....

We have a whole country that thrives on India's issues even when their own citizens are starving for food.... Plus we have a whole party who can do anything to gain power...🤢

Originally posted by: anjs

Exactly, i feel there is more than what meets the eye in this jnu protest scenario.... Some vested party is manipulating the students and using them to further it's own cause......

Claims that abvp people were carrying acid exactly when Deepika was gonna visit.... Not blaming Deepika entirely but someone is being a mastermind here.... To disrupt the country, to spread hatred, discontent and malign the present government badly.....

We have a whole country that thrives on India's issues even when their own citizens are starving for food.... Plus we have a whole party who can do anything to gain power...🤢

Whole JNU was against the fees hike ..govt roll back and minimize the fees to the student those using apple phone in hand and fight for 100-200 fees hike.... leftist still against the minimum fees hike and therefore in protest, they don't want to hold the exam in JNU but administration start the process for examination, Leftist capture the server room and destroyed also because all the registration information kept through online process and fight with the students those came for registration....

pehle inhone koota phir unhone koota ...fight dono taraf se hui but sympathy sirf leftist se hi kyu ? isi ko AGENDA boltey hai aur yaho common aur neutral bande ko aur strong karta hai MODI ko vote dene ko ki yeh sab AGENDA sirf aur sirf ek bande ke against hai.

There pakistan is set to meddle and use this to malign the country some more

Harmeet Singh

@I_am_HS_khalsa

Congratulations to be in this list ... Now you will be quoted by pakistani general to act against India and they will use your cheap publicity to defame india .#boycottchhapaak @deepikapadukone

Originally posted by: MahanalayakKarn

CAA is toothless without NCR.

1. NCR requires peeps to submit documents proving their parents/grandparents/etc were born in India before a certain date. The one being tossed around is Bangladeshi independence in 1971! How many poor families of any religion do you know who keep documents dated back then?

2. Then, CAA kicks in. Of the people who don't have documents, all except Muslim will be granted citizenship.

This here is what people are protesting. Not that Muslim refugees won't be allowed in. If this is implemented 10s of millions of Muslims will lose citizenship and rights in the land of their ancestors.

Please stop spreading lies.

Neither of them is a threat to any legal citizen of India, including Indian Muslims. But still if you have issue then opposition to NRC can even be understood but not to CAA. This rabid opposition to CAA just underlines what a section of people of a particular ideology think about people who are not from their ideology. The hatred is just too palpable and they are just trying to mask it by using tri-colour.

Any person born in India on or after 26 January 1950, but prior to the commencement of the 1986 Act on 1 July 1987, is a citizen of India by birth.

A person born in India on or after 1 July 1987 but before 3 December 2004 is a citizen of India if one of parents was a citizen of India at the time of the birth.

Those born in India on or after 3 December 2004 are considered citizens of India only if both of their parents are citizens of India or if one parent is a citizen of India and the other is not an illegal migrant at the time of their birth.

And if non-Indian Muslims are persecuted in their heavenly Islamic countries then what is the point of having an Islamic country ? Did they not opt for an Islamic country to live in peace and prosper ? So why do these non-Indian Muslims even want to come to a secular country like India ? They should live and prosper in their own Islamic countries or their countries should adopt a secular constitution like India.

Originally posted by: ponymo

Hindu population has always hovered around 2-3% in Pakistan ever since the first census in 1951.

There's no such 23% or 25% figure with a proper source.

https://www.hudson.org/research/9781-cleansing-pakistan-of-minorities

Originally posted by: flipfl0p

https://www.hudson.org/research/9781-cleansing-pakistan-of-minorities

There are many fact-checks available rebutting this claim.

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/pakistan-bangladesh-non-muslim-population-citizenship-amendment-bill-bjp-1627678-2019-12-12

https://twitter.com/LOLiyapa/status/1214808617695596544

What if Raj in DDLJ was just a rich playboy who just acted nice to get Simran? Was he nice to her after marriage?

What if I had chosen a different course in my college? My profession could have been different. My spouse could have been... My child could have been ...

We all can have hundreds of "What if" scenarios. But here we have a protest with so much media coverage, based on a "What if" scenario.

Whom exactly CAA deals with? Illegal immigrants.

Is it applicable to Indian citizens ? No.

What is NRC?

A registry for every Indian. Every country has. (If I am correct, Bangladesh has NRIC, Pakistan has NADRA, Afghanistan has NRD). We always had some kind of registry. In 70's & 80's everyone had ration card. Poor people used to get cheap kerosene using that. For the voter list, names in the ration card were considered. But that did not have any face. So cheating was common. Many times a family would go to polling booth and would come to know, someone has already voted in their name. Then votercard was introduced (where everybody appeared like ghosts). Then Adhar. These cards became necessary to get driving licence, LPG (gas) connection etc. Now, they are trying for degitised NRC. A better version of that.

NRC will consider our older registers (ration card/voting card etc) as the proof. If not, some witnesses.

Today, we are not using 2006 Nokia mobile model. We want our mobile to be upgraded, but not our identity cards?

Has it been implemented? NO.

Finally, what are the protests for?

Protest is for "What if" when NRC is implemented, "What if" an Indian Muslim has no records for his entire life or his family for past seventy years and no friends to prove that they know him/her. Then he would come under CAA. (Don't bring poverty here. From the beginning, it was poor people who first registered in Ration card for kerosene).

I wonder, why no one protested when voted ID was introduced. There also they could have used the same argument. Poor people cannot prove their identity. So, just let them vote without identity card. I would have called myself Rahul Gandhi and voted.

Lastly, am I pro CAA? No.

Not in current form. It kind of regularises illegal immigration and not promoting those who are genuinely facing persecution and discrimination in their country for being Hindus. Bangladesh is not as intolerant towards their Hindu minority as Pakistan. But India-Bangladesh border is porous. So more people will come to India for economical benefits (not because of religious persecution). Because they have stayed in India this long (illegally), they get benefits (whether they were religiously persecuted or not).

People in Pakistan whose Hindu identity is threatened (Couple of days back, in Nankhana Sahib Pakistan a holy shrine for Sikhs, priest's daughter was abducted, forcefully got converted and married a Muslim) will not get much benefit out of CAA, as they cannot sneak into India, as borders are tight.

Instead of this, India should have introduced an "Asylum Visa" where people can apply and land legally in India. Then give a conditional offer of citizenship following a good conduct.

Here I feel, government's intention is good, but the implementation is bad. But that will not make me lend support this anti CAA protests, which are going on for an absurd cause.