KHKT is really a boon for ITV - Page 5

Originally posted by: sohit-mishbir

Hii srishti.. I am alisha... 🤗

I guess you are one of readers... I have seen your comment in one of my stories...

Yes, Alisha I am one of reader of your Ronakshi stories ☺

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

Why not if a Superman can become a normal man why not a nagin can become human

Do u believe in Hinduism religion

If then ..dasavathar ..half human half lion. Is one of God form

Then why not icchadhari naagin ...

In supernatural u can imagine anything

If lions can talk ..then humans can change in to naagins

The first dialogue jo itne confidence ke saath likha hai na... That's straight out from khkt... Yaad toh hoga na... Nahi hai toh yaad dilaun?? 🤣

Hinduism... Ok.. So now you choose religion?? Though I don't feel like answering this question... Still let me clear it out to you...

I am hindu and that too from brahmin family..

Since you have given the reference of so many forms.. Let me tell you..

I am very well aware of all these forms / avatars your are talking.. Matsya avatar se leke nrusinha avatar tak mujhe maloom hai..

Cmg to your ichaddhari nag and naggin... I thought we are in 21st century... And tv shows of such retrogressive thought process... I don't prefer to watch.. Tumhare show hai... Your are free to watch... Comment, appreciate.. Whatever..in that forum..!! This is our forum and we prefer our show here!!!

I'm still pissed off with the show for how it treated the stalker thing and spoilt off the wedding of Ronakshi for me but the only one thing which still makes the show good is rohit and sonakshi's equation. I still can't get over the scene where rohit consoled sonakshi and said her that they can't keep everyone happy in the family and he is ok still she and his mom is in good terms. Rarely I'm seen male lead do this, I have seen the male lead being worried that why that member does not like female lead and trying to please that person. I still have problems with the show but well if we get rohit and sonakshi's scenes and their equation remains untouched without any misunderstanding. Well kahan hum kahan hum will still remain boon for television.

Originally posted by: LoveAnushka

Haha! Superman becomes normal man but Superman toh insaan hi hota hai kamse Kam! 😆 And a Naagin turning into human, uhh ugh, believe hi nahi hota, nahi! At least Hume toh nahi hota!

And btw, aaj tak Lion King ya Jungle Book ke characters ya aur bhi kuch, human form main change nahi huye! Apne original form main rahe! *Matter Of Fact*

And anushkii... Look she has used the same dialogue which sona did on Rohit... Remember🤣🤣

Originally posted by: Sp8699

Yes, Alisha I am one of reader of your Ronakshi stories ☺

Ahann... Yeshhh..... It's all coz of all of you that I write!

So srishti.. Nice to meet you...🤗

And anushkii... Look she has used the same dialogue which sona did on Rohit... Remember🤣🤣

Yeah Sona had said this same dialogue to Rohit ...

Originally posted by: sohit-mishbir

The first dialogue jo itne confidence ke saath likha hai na... That's straight out from khkt... Yaad toh hoga na... Nahi hai toh yaad dilaun?? 🤣

Hinduism... Ok.. So now you choose religion?? Though I don't feel like answering this question... Still let me clear it out to you...

I am hindu and that too from brahmin family..

Since you have given the reference of so many forms.. Let me tell you..

I am very well aware of all these forms / avatars your are talking.. Matsya avatar se leke nrusinha avatar tak mujhe maloom hai..

Cmg to your ichaddhari nag and naggin... I thought we are in 21st century... And tv shows of such retrogressive thought process... I don't prefer to watch.. Tumhare show hai... Your are free to watch... Comment, appreciate.. Whatever..in that forum..!! This is our forum and we prefer our show here!!!

In mahabharath there is mention of icchadhari naagin ..so mahabharat is regressive

Bcos u r eyes don't see it ..it does not become false ...

There is so much we don't know in this universe ..

What we know is less than 1 percent even today with all technology

In quantum mechanics an object is seen at same time at both places ...till now no universified single theory can explain this .

This I am writing because u mentioned the word retrogressive

Supernatural shows r not retrogressive

Retrogressive is raping women ...killing women bcos she has EMA ..and retrogressive is showing a n unmarried woman who is not virgin as characterless women

Retrogressive is showing ML slapping FL ..

Originally posted by: LoveAnushka

Haha! Superman becomes normal man but Superman toh insaan hi hota hai kamse Kam! 😆 And a Naagin turning into human, uhh ugh, believe hi nahi hota, nahi! At least Hume toh nahi hota!

And btw, aaj tak Lion King ya Jungle Book ke characters ya aur bhi kuch, human form main change nahi huye! Apne original form main rahe! *Matter Of Fact*

So u have problem in imagining human as naag .some one has problem in imagining a man becoming Superman

So it all comes to u r perspective

Nothing is absurd

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

In mahabharath there is mention of icchadhari naagin ..so mahabharat is regressive

Bcos u r eyes don't see it ..it does not become false ...

There is so much we don't know in this universe ..

This I am writing because u mentioned the word retrogressive

Supernatural shows r not retrogressive

Retrogressive is raping women ...killing women bcos she has EMA ..and retrogressive is showing a n unmarried woman who is not virgin as characterless women

Retrogressive is showing ML slapping FL ..

Mahabharat has mentioning of ichaddhari naagin?? Which verse could you please elaborate..

I was talking of the show's content my dear.. How the things are potrayed..I was talking of that.. Humans turning into naag naah to humans is secondary..

Characterless hona nahi hona... Thats a completely different issue... Which you are bringing up here... I don't know why?!! Ml slaping fl.... It depends on the context...

Super natural shows aren't retrogressive??? I would have believed it cent percent if you were talking of son pari, shaktimaan, shararat, hatim,... But honestly I won't support it for naagin kind of shows!!

Originally posted by: sohit-mishbir

Mahabharat has mentioning of ichaddhari naagin?? Which verse could you please elaborate..

I was talking of the show's content my dear.. How the things are potrayed..I was talking of that.. Humans turning into naag naah to humans is secondary..

Characterless hona nahi hona... Thats a completely different issue... Which you are bringing up here... I don't know why?!! Ml slaping fl.... It depends on the context...

Super natural shows aren't retrogressive??? I would have believed it cent percent if you were talking of son pari, shaktimaan, shararat, hatim,... But honestly I won't support it for naagin kind of shows!!