Here's why Anurag from KZK reboot is the worst boyfriend ever NTPg7 - Page 16

Originally posted by: SheAish

As I mentioned in my example above context of peopl'es actions matters.

And didn't even have to mention Bajaj. They just needed to tell the context of every action they have talked about Anu here and in that sense Bajaj's actions would also have been talked about without even having to mention Bajaj. But they deliberately just labled without giving any details. If they wanted to be fair they would have written exact sequence of all these actions they talked about that Anu did so readers can make their own judgements. Which is why I said it seems like written by a Bajaj fangirl...Mjey aysahi laga....MY OPINION.

ok.. toh ajtak jitne character criticism portal aye hai media mai ITV characters ke liye either they are fans of other or nei toh hater 😆

sorry i dint know that before 😆

Originally posted by: -TeriMalang-

I hope u know there is entertainment column aswell.where movies, tv show ,actors and characters are discussed.it gives publicity and brings in audience😊

Absolutely we have all read reviews of movies, shows and characters and we know responsible journalist or critic would mention balanced views on them..And make an overarching feeling..

Look at how the article it is unabashed negatives with name calling and clearly made by someone who does not like S2 Anurag versus S1 Anurag...It is so biased in its hate when it wades into the names of actors also in it for character playing A in 2 seasons.

You can't write a objective assessment/ article if you are writing with so many biases in your brain.

Originally posted by: pallawi1803

Lolzz wo to dikh hi Raha hai...recent trp trends are proofs kaun show kitna bech Raha hai🤣 upar se jump maara tha n show ki trp bhi waise hi jump maar gayi🤣🤪

Pallawi what boggles me is that this journalist spent imp time of his life watching KZK reboot just to write artical on AB 😅. I feel bad for journalist. If he/she didn't watch it from start than can we question what kind of analysis was done to write it or did he/she stalk IF for this puts 😂. News channel's are so vella to write articals on KZK characters😅.

Originally posted by: EtherealRati

unfortunately it isnt written by any fangirl..but by times now and times now is reputed publication if i am not wrong.....and it has nothing to do with bajaj actions i guess. Its the mere disappointment of a viewer who must have watched season 1 and is disappointed with the characterization of anurag in season 2. Now its someone's perspective....toh aisa nahi hain ki koi pathar ki lakeer hain. May be its garbage for you....but i dont find it garbage as such .....though i am not saying this because i dont personally like anurag characterization as well. I feel some points mentioned are valid and cant be defended while some can be easily defended as well. Thus seeing no defence was kinda shocking.....discussions become interesting when counterpoints are given but i guess nobody was interested in discussions today.

Anybody could be a fangirl of anyone...Yaha mods are also fan girls...why won't journalists have they own favs as well. And I only said it "seems like", because it failed to talk about the context and sequence of events that led to all these actions they talked about that Anu did.

The sequence of events that also had Bajaj's actions involved in it. Like I said context of actions matters. Other wise even courts would not need explanations of who did what why and where in what circumstances when taking their judgments.

They only had to outline the sequence of events and people would have made their own judgments based on what is written and what they perceive it as....if it had been a fair article. This article simply made blanket statements only.

Originally posted by: opsora2090

yes they wrote against bajaj .. iyeahi forum pe post hui thi .. hum sab milke maja bhi udaye the ...

even anupre ka neg trend , positive trend sabka news aye the ..where they mention they dont want bajaj...

aur mujhe iyad hai 3-4 logoke bakwas comment uthake ek post banaye the.. probably tc .. people reject bajaj . kuch aise probably ..mujhe exact headline iyad nei ..

toh keya hum iyea blame kia kisi other fd ka fangirl iyea article likha ?

Probably you are not able to get me..

There was never such an character bashing article at-least that i am aware of and this is not common in ITV world...Surely there are many ITV articles like mentioning what is happening based on spoilers etc like TC you mentioned and most of the time gaga about actors whether playing positive/ negative characters.

May be people made post based on article on which they may have used name calling..That is the difference am talking about..Bashing words in Main article VERSUS comments on post carrying any ITV article.

But the main article itself which such language is not that common or almost non-existent in ITV world!

Originally posted by: SheAish

Anybody could be a fangirl of anyone...Yaha mods are also fan girls...why won't journalists have they own favs as well. And I only said it "seems like", because it failed to talk about the context and sequence of events that led to all these actions they talked about that Anu did.

The sequence of events that also had Bajaj's actions involved in it. Like I said context of actions matters. Other wise even courts would not need explanations of who did what why and where in what circumstances when taking their judgments.

They only had to outline the sequence of events and people would have made their own judgments based on what is written and what they perceive it as....if it had been a fair article. This article simply made blanket statements only.

Originally posted by: Sowmya_nathan

Probably you are not able to get me..

There was never such an character bashing article at-least that i am aware of and this is not common in ITV world...Surely there are many ITV articles like mentioning what is happening based on spoilers etc like TC you mentioned and most of the time gaga about actors whether playing positive/ negative characters.

May be people made post based on article on which they may have used name calling..That is the difference am talking about..Bashing words in Main article VERSUS comments on post carrying any ITV article.

But the main article itself which such language is not that common or almost non-existent in ITV world!

but aisa har kisi character , shows, actors ke sath hotei hai , isse bhi jeyada bhayanak tarikese .. that is media ... and iyea jo bhi likha ofcourse they are stalking fans reviews.. and currently they have got these kind of vibes from viewers .. that is why this article . same bajaj neg post , cos they that time got negative review from audience.. that time bajaj fd was not exist ...

so it is simple and not new

Originally posted by: BombayGirl10

Pallawi what boggles me is that this journalist spent imp time of his life watching KZK reboot just to write artical on AB 😅. I feel bad for journalist. If he/she didn't watch it from start than can we question what kind of analysis was done to write it or did he/she stalk IF for this puts 😂. News channel's are so vella to write articals on KZK characters😅.

Originally posted by: SheAish

Anybody could be a fangirl of anyone...Yaha mods are also fan girls...why won't journalists have they own favs as well. And I only said it "seems like", because it failed to talk about the context and sequence of events that led to all these actions they talked about that Anu did.

The sequence of events that also had Bajaj's actions involved in it. Like I said context of actions matters. Other wise even courts would not need explanations of who did what why and where in what circumstances when taking their judgments.

They only had to outline the sequence of events and people would have made their own judgments based on what is written and what they perceive it as....if it had been a fair article. This article simply made blanket statements only.

That pretty much sums of all that was needed to answer the article..Characters do not exist in vacuum or space..Actions of characters are with some background..The article just bashes character with name calling without any context or background built up.

Originally posted by: EtherealRati

exactly...there you go.....the first defence....and so true....he might act selfish in a certain situation but anurag doesnt have selfishness as a characterstic. Khair as you said .....people were not intersted in meaningful discussions and then i was looking for something like that only....and thats why felt empty handed after reading so many pages....such a waste of time.

First of all thank you for being civil with your reply. Like SheAish pointed out, the article is only giving out half truths for whatever reasons . I don’t feel like wasting my energy defending Anu for such a baseless article. It is easier and better to troll😆