Originally posted by: krystal_watz
Empyreanism:
What does it matter what Prakash Raj and Rituparno Ghosh said about her? Just because they were acclaimed directors doesn't mean that whatever they said is correct.
And 'caught your eyes' doesn't necessarily mean good acting ability. It could also be X factor, screen presence or suitability for a particular role.
How many great performances can you name by Kareena where she had to show range and complexity?
How does it matter? That you have to ask your fellow friends who are deriding members who find Kareena talented. According to them, their opinions are facts. And someone also asked when did the industry ever consider Kareena as an actress? So that was the answer to that.
Yes right what acclaimed directors feel can be incorrect but what forum members say is the gospel truth 😆 Just because you don't agree with what they say their views now are incorrect? 😆 Well to each his own.
That's the point. Kareena's performance wasn't good in MPKDH but still she managed to catch his eyes as you are saying. And a director won't consider an 'average' actress for four of his films with roles which require talent just because she has X-factor, screen presence etc.
IMO, I would say Chameli, JWM, Dev, Omkara, Kurbaan, Talaash, Heroine (even if the movie was crap)
How about you naming performances by Kareena where she had to show range and complexity but couldn't?
Edited by Empyreanism - 6 years ago
7