Originally posted by: purepunjabi
it's a punishment in itself that she is wandering here and there with those dirty clothes and such a mental condition..she was living like a princess in the haveli and village...maybe everyone feel pity for her in the end including thakur but she will not scott free.. Acc to me she is used by KBjust as a medium to take those shivlings to kaashi for shudikaran because she was the one who was responsible for moving those shivlings from the temple and now she will place those shivlings again in the temple. The one who started all this will end it with her own hands..with no family,no relationships,no money at the end.
Originally posted by: janecastle
And if KB himself can come to end Inder, then why not do the same for Namrata. Namrata has done similar or far worse crimes than Inder. So how exactly does it make any sense to let Namrata go scott free while Inder gets punishment for Namrata's crimes too. When you are delivering justice, then why show partiality in it. If people are shown forgiving her for crimes just because she is insane now, I will be really disappointed with this show.
well I'm getting your point too...definitely not enough but i will still say it's beginning of her punishment,part of her punishment.she should get a severe punishment and i think she will get that too. She can no longer feel anything,she is wandering here and there alone ..Don't remember anything about her and anyone else except just rahul... Even if happy in her own imaginative world .i think it's a kind of punishment.btw this reminded me of movie anjaam😆 where madhuri is like god is unfair..shahrukh isn't being punished properly because he is paralyzed.so she will recover him and then kill her..atlast she died too .😛Inadequate I would say. First, Madness is not any punishment. She isnt suffeing because she can no longer feel anything. She is happy in her own world. Without realisation what she has done and what she has lost this punishment doesn't make sense. In fact she going insane doesn't make sense. Did she really ever loved Rahul? She used him to steal shivlings, to murder people and even asked him to murder his own family.' Sab tumhare liyr kiya'. Really? Knowing he loves Gauri she wanted to have him using the power of shivlings or even using hypnotism. No, she never loved him. She just wanted to have a slave to fulfill her desires. And because Sethji kidnapped Rahul and probably w ould kill him she lost her mental balance
Also, Shivlings are pious. Why should a criminal be allowed to take it when innocent people who were killed by her in the temple were denied respect even after death ?Second, Sarpanch and his daughter got more punishment for just saving Sheru who being a mentally challenged boy had accidentally murdered Vaid's son.
comment:
p_commentcount