Anandi Vs Akheraj started even before the leap.Only thing is Anandi did not know his name or where he lived.
If at all any bloopers created it was those hit and miss scenes between Anandi and Akheraj which happened in BH and in Jagya's office just to show that Anandi did not see Akheraj.
If Anandi had seen Akheraj Mangala wouldn't have gotten the chance to do herogiri.đ
It has been Anandi Vs Akheraj from the time he kidnapped Anandi's baby.
She got to know the name of the kidnapper and his whereabouts because of Jagya
It is her case against Akheraj her daughter's case against Akheraj
Jagya was a witness to one case which could not be proved also even with his statement.
Anandi was assaulted and her child was kidnapped she has three cases against Akheraj.One for assaulting her second one kidnapping her child third one her daughter's child marriage.
Kamili is a witness in Gopal's case Mangala has one case Gopal's parents have one case.
People keep talking about empowerment - Empowerment is victims standing up for themselves without looking for outside help.
Had the villagers been able to stand up for themselves they would not have needed Vidhayaksa's help they would have sent him packing to jail on their own or at least tried to get him punished like Anandi is doing or Mangala is doing or Kamili is trying to do.
Yes story lines have been changed .A goonda suddenly develops ambitions of a making a career in politics and for some reason thinks Vidhyaksa will help him đ